Hooniverse Asks: What's History's Greatest American Engine/Foreign Car Hybrid?

By Robert Emslie Mar 15, 2016

pantera
When someone tells you they drive a hybrid do your eyes light up and your tail start wagging as you picture a 327-powered Bizzarrini driven by the lady from the AT&T commercials? Or, do you scowl as if they just offered you a bite of their cat turd sammich, and picture a Prius driven by a Birkenstock-wearing Ed Begley, Jr on his way back from a hemp juice high colonic?
If it’s the former, then we have much to discuss.
Before the term was besmirched by the environmentalists and “hypermilers” hybrid used to mean a beautiful and impractical foreign-made body carrying some form of large and typically pushrod-equipped V8, built in the U.S. of A., or maybe Canada. The form factor arose in the fifties with cars like the Allard, but really took off in the Sixties as American V8s found their legs and foreign (mostly European) cottage car makers started sprouting like mushrooms, seemingly overnight. Considering that many are thought of as members of the most illustrious car club known to man, what do you think is the greatest hybrid in the world?
Image: Pinterest

0 thoughts on “Hooniverse Asks: What's History's Greatest American Engine/Foreign Car Hybrid?”
  1. The Bristol Fighter, packing a Chryco V10 that would have otherwise wound up in a Viper. It’s not as quick as a Viper due to portliness, but Bristol claimed a 210mph top speed. Unknown whether that’s independently verified.
    There was a turbocharged concept that never made it to production with over 1k horseponies, and Bristol claimed a 270mph top speed. Lew-duh-kris.
    http://www.topcarrating.com/bristol/2007-bristol-fighter-t-4.jpg

    1. https://www.boc.net/page.php?currPage=cars&sc=5 for some info. Wikipedia says 13 cars made, other sources say 15. Max Bostrom, the designer used to work for Brabham F1 and he designed a zero lift at both ends, car with a drag coefficient of 0.28. Mercedes Benz W124s and W220s given 500+ bhp can easily achieve 200mph, they have a similar drag coefficient and more frontal area. A McLaren F1 has 625bhp, a 0.31 Cd and a little less frontal area, ( much wider, but lower) and is rev limited to 240 mph i.e.redline at top speed, so yes 210 mph top speed sounds about right. They certainly didn’t make as many Bristols at the end as they did in their heyday.
      http://www.bristolcars.co.uk/Banner/Cars-Past_04.jpg

      1. That is an extraordinary photo – they only built 620 Bristol 401’s in 5 years so that must be 6 month’s worth in that one photo!

          1. Of course, but there are what look like 8 painted body shells lined up in the centre of the shot plus another batch at the far right hand side, presumably in holding; this seems a disproportionate number of their annual output to have on hand at one time, part-way through the build process (freshly painted and susceptible to damage, and taking up space). Not six month’s worth, but I count 42 cars in the shot.
            I suppose it depends in what size batches Touring delivered the bodies from Italy.

  2. The market would probably say Bizzarrini GT 5300, one of which recently topped $1M at auction.

    1. Carroll Shelby raced a Cad-Allard. Coincidence? I think not. That and its stellar race results is why the car needs to be in the discussion for GOAT.

          1. They made some supercharged models, 3 were included in the liquidators auction in Australia. I don’t know if any were sold before then.

          1. The rumor is the MG was developed in part with the BMW 5 which left a trans tunnel and rear subframe that could be converted to RWD.
            It really is an interesting car.

          2. I think it was more along the lines of the Pacifica and M Class. Enough wiggle room for FWD/AWD/RWD.
            The 75 and ZT were twins. Not sure if any 75 V8 was created.
            That would have been cool…

          3. My uncle owned a six cylindre 75 for a long time, bought new. BRG paint and tan interior. Very nice car, but the “faked dandyism” inside was just too much to bear. It’s from his dealer that I heard that BMW was developing a 6 series at the time they bought Rover, but they found out the car would do better there. I guess the whole adventure was a solid miscalculation.

          4. No.
            BMW stuffed up.
            They never understood Rover and it’s design heritage and thought they were buying BMC/Austin Morris with LandRover attatched. They botched the launch at the first motor show by insulting the workers and management and Britain in general.
            A truer test of the car’s worth was achieved when,(specially in Europe) Rover 75s vastly outsold the Jaguar S-Type which was launched at exactly the same time and motor show and which had roughly twice as many dealers selling it for about the same price to a similar prospective customer.

          5. Actually, my uncle went for the Jag first, with the XJ in mind. But with his slightly homeless-on-a-binge dressing style, he wasn’t treated well (or at all) at Jaguar, and went over to Rover quite quickly. What they didn’t know, and shouldn’t even had to think about – all customers are supposed to be treated equally – is that he earns a head-of-medical-department-salary. That can be a substantial lump of money in good old Germany. So maybe the desperation at Rover at the time lead to a much more friendly approach to customers than they had across the street at that other foreign-owned British make.

          6. Rumour not backed by fact according to Rover engineers, like the one about all the first new MINI engineering being done in Germany by BMW. But it fits BMW’s marketing message.

    1. As far as I know, only my KV parts car has been on a plane. I believe Bruce Weiner brought the other one from France as part of a large group of microcars that he had crammed into a shipping container.

      1. Spada Codatronca
        Bertone Mantide
        Devon GTX
        The top two are fancy bodied zr-1s and the last is a clean bodied viper.

      1. Well yes, but it was developed so far beyond the original Buick 215 that it only barely qualifies as the same engine.
        The original Aston Martin Duratec*2 was identical in displacement, vee angle, and power output to two Duratec 3.0s.

    1. Hang on, hang on.
      So, it’s a DOHC Japanese-designed engine based on an OHV Ford engine, which is then stuffed into the wrong end of an American-branded, Korean-built, Japanese-engineered vehicle.
      My head hurts.

    1. Darn, I got all excited that I made it this far down the list without seeing one of these and thought I’d get to bring out the super low-hanging fruit. Oh well, well-played.

      1. Only the “7 Litri” version had that. As the name suggests, they needed it to accomodate their 7 liters engine.
        I too prefer the cleaner lines of the “lesser” models.

      2. That’s always looked like an accordion-sided pop-up to me, which results in a strange urge to push it down until it locks back into place flush with the rest of the hood.

    1. I love Marcos’s (what ever the plural i?s Marci? Group adjective: An Imelda of.. ), the thinking mans TVR.
      Quite fancied the idea of an older Ford V6 one, thinking they’d be relatively affordable relative to a classic TVR or Lotus. They’re not. 🙁

  3. I’m mobile at the moment, so could somebody help me with a courtesy embed or two?
    My votes are for the Gordon Keeble GT,
    And the astonishingly beautiful and impressively obscure Franco-American Monica.

    1. Can’t wait for the follow up “Hooniverse Asks:”
      Foreign engines in American cars.
      (Nash Metro for one, BMW Diesel in Lincolns…. just a thought)

      1. How strict would the rules be on what is American? Pretty much any captive import would have an American nameplate and a foreign engine.

        1. Chassis of North American source.
          That’s how I was able to sneak in the SHOgun in this exercise,.

          1. So captive imports that are made in the US should count? (Think NUMMI)

          2. Chrysler had a lot of engines made my diamler, hyundai and now fiat.
            Also, NAFTA happened. That list ain’t too short.

          3. For the sake AND the bourbon: NUMMI was only partly Japanese owned. 😉

  4. I’m going to take liberties too, a foreign Ford car with an American engine… 1972 XA Ford Falcon GT-HO Phase IV, the car that was killed after one pilot build car went down the line due to political pressure. Why? Well the 170 mph top speed had a bit to do with it! (pictured one of the 3 aborted factory race team builds)

    1. On an Opel tip, does the Opel Speedster Count? Built in the UK by Lotus (essentially an Elise 1.5), powered by a GM Ecotec 2.2, both NA and turbo versions. Then again these particular engines, whille the same as what you’d find in a Chevy Copalt could be found in many regular Opels and was probably assembled in the UK or Germany so where do you draw the line on what’s an American engine?
      http://srv2.betterparts.org/images/opel-speedster-turbo-07.jpg

      1. On the topic of not quite an Elise, there’s also the Tesla Roadster, manufactured as a glider from Lotus, then assembled with a US motor.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 64 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop files here