Hooniverse Asks: What was the Weirdest Model Re-badging?

By Robert Emslie Aug 7, 2015

2008_suzuki_forenza_100011941_l
I have nothing but respect for Caitlyn Jenner and what she’s going through, but I still have to catch myself when referring to the sports legend as I frequently do so as “he.” I have the same problem when it comes to cars and trucks made by one brand, but sold by another. Well, not the same problem as there’s nothing particularly envelope-pushing or brave about slapping your logo on something someone else built.
The rebranding bug seems not to be as prevalent of late, but we’ll just have to see how much Miata is in the Fiat Roadster when it debuts. Once upon a time manufacturers shared models like they did wives in that awful movie The Ice Storm. That’s exactly what we’re interested in today. What, in your opinion, is the weirdest model rebadging that you have ever seen?
Image: TheCarConnection

95 thoughts on “Hooniverse Asks: What was the Weirdest Model Re-badging?”
        1. My gosh! That sounds like the winner in a question Hooniverse hasn’t asked yet – which car evaporated the fastest!

          1. That surely is an unbelievable rate of destruction. And a good Hooniverse Asks for those who control registries.

    1. Definitely a weird one. I think the recent Lancia/Chrysler shenanigans (Chrysler Ypsilon, Lancia Voyager, …) are very strange as well. I can’t remember any rebadging involving Lancia that doesn’t seem weird. Maybe the Y10, if you want to count that.

      1. The Lancia/Chrysler cross-dressing was prefigured a few years earlier in the UK by the re-branding of the whole Daewoo range as Chevrolet.
        Given that the average Brit’s image of ‘Chevy’ is a two-tone ’57 with fins and a lot of chrome it was hard to see what reintroducing the brand to the UK with a bunch of Korean econoboxes was meant to achieve?

        1. They did the same in continental Europe. However, they pulled Chevrolet (apart from Camaro/Corvette) out of most (all?) markets last year. In the UK, they appear to be staying for the rest of 2015.

        2. I’ll admit I did a double-take the first time I saw the Chevy bowtie on the Manchester United jerseys.

          1. A ridiculous investment considering that Chevrolet got the axe, and another excellent illustration of the left hand/right hand bureaucracy at GM…

    1. I always wonder what was the thought process of a Japanese costumer when he/she decided to get this car, what did they expected and what was their reaction a few months later when the car starting to break apart. “But it has a toyota logo in front?!!!”

      1. Someone I know ‘in the trade’ told me that the average time spent rectifying faults on arrival in Japan to bring these cars up to Toyota’s JDM quality standards was longer than the complete build time for two Corollas in Japan. And then they were still the most unreliable model of Toyota sold there.

    2. The Toyota corrolla rebadge to Chevy was odd if only for the procession of names it received: Malibu, Classic, and Prizm were all Corrollas. In a side note, they were all built at Toyota’s SF plant that is now Tesla’s, and during the mfg time this car was rebadged it was -at the same time- Toyota’s worst quality level plant worldwide, and GM’s best quality level plant worldwide.

      1. Actually, the Corolla was assembled and rebadged as GEO Prism, and the plant is in Fremont, CA, not SF. The joint Toyota/GM plant was called “NUMMI” (New United Motor Manufacturing Inc). Small pickups (Tacoma (Hilux)) were also assembled there, along with the Toyota Matrix/Pontiac Vibe twins. As predicted, the venture was not succesful, and was cancelled entirely during the GM bailout.
        Tesla has indeed occupied a portion of the sprawling facility. Thank the Feds for that bit of corporate cronyism. Facts are Facts, Elon Musk is as much a political animal as he is an industrialist.

      2. The GM Plant they were making Malibus at, then became a Saturn Sky plant was a Fisker plant for a very short time, its empty again

  1. Volkswagen Taro pickup. Yes, it’s merely a rebadged Toyota. The taro is a starchy root and an odd name for a trucklet.

    1. Yeah but starchy roots are delicious and Toyota pickups are rad.
      Until they get wet for too long… then starchy roots rot and Toyota pickups, well, rot.

        1. To be fair the Hyundai connection is gone (probably because Hyundai since set up shop on their own in Mexico) and now the Dodge Attitude is this:
          http://s1.cdn.autoevolution.com/images/news/2015-dodge-attitude-is-a-reskinned-mitsubishi-mirage-photo-gallery-91780-7.jpg
          Which is slightly higher effort, being a Mitsubishi that they gave an entire new bumper. Though their other subcompact, the Vision, is lazy, at least it’s in house lazy, because it’s a Fiat.
          http://www.dodge.com.mx/img/autos/1600/vision-2015.jpg

      1. On one hand, they rebadged Vitaras for years, on the other hand they got super lazy with this one.

      1. I’ve driven one of these and they are exactly as bad as you’d expect a Chevy Nova sized, (and weight), car powered by the torque-less carburretored 13b non turbo rotary driving through a GM350 three stage auto.
        Veeery smooth though.

    1. Get some mud and horse-dung on it, take it to your local Lincoln dealer and see what they say!
      After all, that;s where the other Mercuries go for service…

    1. I was at my local pontiac dealer in 1988 messing w Fieros when I saw a foreign (korean?) Le Mans delivered off the truck to the dealer without a radiator. Drove it off the truck that way.. on & off the boat that way….

    1. I was going to say Asuna, then saw your post. They also badged an Isuzu hatchback as an Asuna. Imagine, taking an obscure name (in this market at least) and making it even more obscure by renaming it. When I worked at a Pontiac dealer back then we’d say, “It rusts Asuna you drive it off the lot!”

    2. Why oh why didn’t they just use the Geo name in Canada too? I’m assuming most Canadians can watch US TV channels, therefore there’d be at least some instant brand recognition!

      1. But they did use Geo. Pontiac and Chevrolet had separate dealer networks, and everything Chevrolet got Pontiac wanted.

  2. My first thought was A-M Cygnet, but that’s so obviously, intentionally weird it doesn’t seem fair to use. Then I thought about BMC/BL’s incestuous mashing about with Austin/MG/Morris/Wolseley/Vanden Plas badges, but that doesn’t seem remarkable, either. Because Britain.
    So I am left with my third choice, the ’79-’82 Plymouth Arrow Truck, the only Plymouth pickup truck since the bombing of Pearl Harbor. It was Plymouth’s version of the Dodge D50, which was itself a rebadged Mitsubishi Forte, and was given the same name as Plymouth’s version of the Mitsubishi Celeste coupe. The whole move reeked of “Ah, what the hell,” even at the time.
    http://i1.wp.com/hooniverse.info/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/White-Arrow1.jpg

    1. My old next door neighbor had a Trailduster with the roof removed. He used it like a pickup. Fitting, because as a rebadged Ramcharger, it was about 95% the same as a D150.

      1. No, actually I just forgot about the Scamp. It was a one-year model and according to Allpar they only built 3,564 of them, so I think I might be excused for the oversight?

    1. There is one in Pennsylvania. I’ve seen it twice now and have pictures to prove it. It’s right hand drive and was given by a father to his daughter as her first car.

  3. The Isuzu Aska was based at different times on the GM J-car platform, the Honda Accord, and the Subaru Legacy.

    1. I think I’d be a little leery of any car whose most-marketable trait is that it is “eventful”.

    1. people in China were probly like “wait Americans are worried about the quality of Chinese cars?”

  4. “I have nothing but respect for Caitlyn Jenner and what she’s going through ”
    His name is Bruce. And he brought this on himself. Sympathy? For what, exactly?

    1. Oh, there’s a lot of German in that box. It’s just that it’s warmed-over Daimler-Benz, not VWAG.

      1. And the Holden Nova, a rebadged Toyota Corolla, another product of the government imposed restrictions, (not what they do nowadays.)
        The Button Plan’s rationale was to improve efficiencies of scale by forcing joint ventures on the car makers so Toyota teamed up with GMHolden and Ford was forced into bed with Nissan; to give us orphans like the Ford Corsair, a rebadged Nissan Bluebird, which was odd because Ford already sold another same sized rebadged Japanese car, a rebadged Mazda 626 as the Ford Telstar. In addition, as well as Mazda based utes and the Falcon utes, was the Ford Maverick, a rebadged Nissan Patrol. in all it’s versions.
        http://www.holden.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Holden-Nova-SLE-Hatch-Manual-1990-008.jpg
        https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c2/1989-1992_Ford_Corsair_(UA)_GL_sedan_01.jpg
        https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7b/1990-1992_Ford_Telstar_TX5_(AV)_Ghia_hatchback_01.jpg
        http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51OGzV1NJML._SX258_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg

          1. Ha! I didn’t even know about that one. I thought Ford had managed to keep the Falcon entirely out of it. We only see dribs and drabs of this unfortunate experiment (which Abbott has now really made all in vain), in NZ. Thanks for the piccie!

  5. One that would have been- Qvale Mangusta rebadged as an MG.
    I’ve been following Peter Stevens on Facebook and asked him about the Xpower based off the Mangusta…
    Hi there Jason, interesting question. The original, and very silly plan, of the directors of MG Rover was to just re-badge the Qvale. But it was a dumb looking car so I insisted that we re-body the car; the project then fell into the corporate money pit with around 130 people getting involved. After a year that team had spent around £20 million and had come up with the plan that a totally new car was needed! At that point the board stopped the project and asked me what I could do for £10 million, I bravely said I could give them a car within 18 months with the first prototype ready in a year! I put together a very small team that kept the chassis and running gear, kept the windscreen and some of the underneath structure, and produced a new outer skin using what at that time was a revolutionary new composite process. We planned that it would be a £55,000 car but the board were greedy and decided to sell it for £80,000! It was only designed to be a 55grand car so we sold around 50 before MG Rover went into liquidation but MG Sport and Racing remained viable for another year and probably more than 80 cars were eventually made. The car was supposed to look tough and aggressive rather than cute because I thought that its job was to present the company as being tough too. Hope that helps, I may write a lengthy piece after the summer, Peter

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 64 MB. You can upload: image. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop files here