Ignoring the political schism they engender, there is still something immensely frustrating about watching the veritable ghost town that is the HOV lane when you’re stuck solo in traffic. High Occupancy Vehicle lanes first appeared in the U.S. back in the 1970s, as carrot and stick approach to engendering greater efficiency out of our nation’s existing highway infrastructure. During the ’80s and ’90s the lanes – open to cars with a minimum of 2 or 3 occupants as well as motorcycles – expanded their reach across the nation. Other countries have adopted the traffic management tactic as well. In the last decade the right to ride in the typically more freely moving highway lane has been broadened to include solo drivers in hybrid and pure electric cars.
It was this amendment to the HOV club rules that I think caused the pushback by drivers stuck in the regular lanes. Today, there are grumblings about HOV lanes and their use. Some advocate denying access to anyone who would not otherwise be occupying a car, excluding sub-driving age children and the blind from enjoying getting home a little early. Others decry the perceived environmentalist elitism the lanes engender, and advocate their elimination entirely, thus opening up another lane to the egalitarian solo driver traffic.
Of course a derivation of Parkinson’s Law is that traffic will expand to fill the available highway space, and then we’d be simply stuck to stop and go on 5 lanes instead of just 4. Plus, all those socially enlightened carpoolers would be condemned to suffer the same fate. The question for today is, would you prefer that over the occasional chance to slip into the HOV lane and sail past the teeming masses, just because it happened to be take you kid to work day? More to the point, when you are rolling solo on the highway, and see the HOV lane occupants go zipping by, unencumbered by the sloth caused by traffic volumes unanticipated by the road’s designers, does that tick you off?
Image: Autos by Sympatico
Leave a Reply