Spotted: An H-M-Vehicles Free-way!

By Jeff Glucker Aug 13, 2020

I’ve been trying to get a picture of this thing for a while now. I know where it parks. But the road where I see it is a tight, twisting ribbon hidden in a canyon and it’s not a great place to stop. Then yesterday I was sitting on the side of the road, setting up a camera for in-car video when this H-M-Vehicles Free-way rumbled past and pulled over not 20 yards from where I was parked.

This funky little runabout is part of a production run that spanned four years and produced around 700 examples. The buzzy engine sounded like it came from a dirtbike, but Wikipedia tells me it’s more likely a one-cylinder mill which probably came from a lawnmower. H-M-V offered the Free-way with a choice between two gas engines, a diesel, or an electric. And no one ordered the diesel, which is mildly hilarious.

But if anyone knows anything about these… he’s waiting in our comment section. Doc, the floor is yours – tell us all about the H-M-V Free-way.

By Jeff Glucker

Jeff Glucker is the co-founder and Executive Editor of Hooniverse.com. He’s often seen getting passed as he hustles a 1991 Mitsubishi Montero up the 405 Freeway. IG: @HooniverseJeff

75 thoughts on “Spotted: An H-M-Vehicles Free-way!”
  1. They have plastic windows that barely fit. They can barely hit a speed that makes them safe on back streets. They are just plain not safe. This from someone who really wants a seventies Citi-Car. You have to be a sadist to own a Freeway.

    1. Mine has the smaller 12 hp engine and will hit sixty-ish on the freeway, given enough time. The original front suspension is notoriously unstable at speed but the much-improved “racing” modification is still available, easy to install, and readily reversible.

          1. Just to clarify: I have bottomless respect and admiration for those who take care of odd cars like that, and who even share their knowledge and adventures online. Perfect!

            That said, mdharrell also seems tolerant of whatever quip is hurled his way.

          2. I didn’t mean it that way either. I am honestly curious since I want a really odd car and I am trying to talk my wife into it. I want this thing for two reasons. It’s one of the strangest seventies cars and its electric. I want to use it as a means to learn how to do electronics by doing upgrades to it. I know she is okay with two classics. That being our Corvair and probably a classic truck. I don’t know if i can do a third until our kids move out. We own too large of a fleet of cars right now with teenagers.

            https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/d35c8e86268dd1734b5fc5d99e9c0d71a58bb90df9afd5693aa73930422e5fb1.jpg

          3. Whenever I go to Oslo, I see one or two of these. Definitely unusual. Learning how-to-EV in order to pimp something more common, too, eventually?

          4. I have a very short commute right now of only thirteen miles but one part of it involves getting up to 55mph. So a gokart wouldn’t work. AN upgraded gokart though…

        1. The racing part is a joke on the part of the guy who designed and still makes these, as he calls it the Freeway Advanced Racing Team (F.A.R.T.) kit. Nonetheless it fixes two very real problems with the original: First, as originally designed, the front suspension forces the wheels to move FORWARD when rising in response to a bump. Second, the positive scrub radius is so large that the extended line of the steering axis is completely inboard of the entire contact patch, in that the steering axis is more or less vertical. The kit relocates the lower rod end bearing outwards to a point under the brake drum, reducing the scrub radius, and changes the angle of the lever arm for the torsion bar so that the front wheels now move REARWARD when rising. Below is the original suspension at top and the modified version at bottom:

          https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50223269336_a9d9e0de0b_z.jpg

          The same guy also makes a kit to introduce Ackermann geometry to the steering (it has none), but I’ve never felt the need to install this.

          1. I saw it on Craigslist and traded the seller my MGB for it. I’m fairly happy with it but every now and then I wonder whether I should have come up with the difference in order to have gone with the considerably more expensive Velorex he also had up for sale.

          2. I saw it on Craigslist and traded the seller my MGB for it. I’m fairly happy with it but every now and then I wonder whether I should have come up with the difference in order to have gone with the considerably more expensive Velorex he also had up for sale.

          3. Don’t know the Velorex. As a former owner of a couple of MG Midgets lets say it sounds like you came out on the good side of that deal.

          4. Don’t know the Velorex. As a former owner of a couple of MG Midgets lets say it sounds like you came out on the good side of that deal.

          5. The Velorex Oskar is a three-wheeled Czech vehicle with a tube frame and soft vinyl body panels. This video features one but contains almost no useful information about them:

          6. So one of the Zappa’s made a video about being a European rock-shaman. This is a great way to showcase a car that, like you said, has nothing to do with the car. Although I can see why you would want one of those. It’s just too weird not to want one.

          7. I installed the F.A.R.T. many years ago. I also designed my own steering suspension set with gas springs against the frame to the pitman arm. I think it did a better job. I don’t recall the Ackermann geometry kit. Maybe after I left the group?

      1. If you’re going to all that trouble and thinking about making it reversible anyway, would you not just fit a decent 1 cylinder from a bike that some newbie rider unprepared for the power delivery of a single banger has fallen off of. (i.e. someone an idiot Ike me if I ever got on a bike). C’mon, who doesn’t wanna see an mdharrell tripod of doom?

      2. If you’re going to all that trouble and thinking about making it reversible anyway, would you not just fit a decent 1 cylinder from a bike that some newbie rider unprepared for the power delivery of a single banger has fallen off of. (i.e. someone an idiot Ike me if I ever got on a bike). C’mon, who doesn’t wanna see an mdharrell tripod of doom?

  2. That… doesn’t look like the stock Tecumseh engine. Not only does the glimpse available through the side look wrong, but I have no idea how that exhaust would work.

    As far as the diesel “option” is concerned, I asked the designer about this back in 2010. Not only were none ordered by customers but HM Vehicles themselves never bothered to order an engine so as to be able to construct one, either. They figured they’d worry about it only if it actually became an issue.

    By the way, before anyone expresses concern about the external baggage covering the rear window, I’ll say from experience that the window is worthless for visibility anyway.

          1. I can’t help but think this is some sort of dubious honor, like a fast eating title in the Guinness Book of Records.

  3. “…produced around 700 examples.”

    Fun fact: Before switching to standardized seventeen-character VINs towards the end, Freeways were given serial numbers that jumped by ten, thereby making the production run look larger. Mine is HMV4490G81 (G for gasoline, 81 for the year), but the 4490 indicates that it is number 449. The previous one was 4480 and the next was 4500.

    1. A few months ago I picked up a 16 hp Tecumseh (the optional big engine) to swap into mine as an upgrade for its 12 hp Tecumseh. Most of them were manufactured with the 16 hp engine in the first place, for reasons that are obvious to any owner of the 12 hp version.

        1. The Trabant’s* 0.6 litre engine produced 23 hp and doing 100 kph on the motorway was seen as a badge of honour.

          *standard of the other world

          1. I once saw a photo of a Trabant with a trailer hitch, presumably for flat towing other Trabants with a tow bar. Not sure what else it could have managed. The internet shows some intrepid folks posing with camper trailers hooked on, which would seem to alternate between nearly stationary and horrifying. The other popular alternative indeed seems to be trailers made out of the carcasses of other Trabants.

          2. I once saw a photo of a Trabant with a trailer hitch, presumably for flat towing other Trabants with a tow bar. Not sure what else it could have managed. The internet shows some intrepid folks posing with camper trailers hooked on, which would seem to alternate between nearly stationary and horrifying. The other popular alternative indeed seems to be trailers made out of the carcasses of other Trabants.

        1. I’m so giddy with anticipation that I’ve almost talked myself into doing the work. It involves removing the entire body from the frame, though, and I’ve heard some horror stories about this.

          1. You will see horrible things, which either mean a lot of body/frame work, or continue driving with certitude that it’s a flimsy death trap with a power bump?

          2. That’s was also my initial reaction when he mentioned the more powerful engine being available at no extra cost when new, too.

          3. The appeal of the smaller engine was the claim that it would provide much better mileage (I mean, it’s right there in the name…), but this attracted few takers. Owners are in general agreement that there’s actually not much difference in terms of fuel economy anyway.

      1. Are they hard to find? Just bot my first Freeway but it won’t start,:( not seeing gas in the glass bulb, fuses are good maybe fuel pump??

    1. Not true! I can legally park in motorcycle spots and can go to the front of the line at state ferry terminals with the “other” motorcycles, both of which are enjoyable experiences.

  4. I pulled out some old order forms to help explain why nobody ever ordered the diesel. As of July 1981 the price of the base-model Freeway was $3495 with the buyer’s choice of either the 12 hp or 16 hp gasoline engine. The Deluxe (which is what I have) was $3695, also with a no-cost choice between the two gas engines. The diesel was $1000 extra, a substantial difference.

    I don’t have the price for the electric version at the same date, but in April 1982 it was listed at $4295 and the gas Deluxe had climbed to $3795. Only a handful (perhaps three?) electrics were made. The circuits for the electric version were designed and wired by the Freeway designer’s son, who was fourteen at the time…

    For everyone now keen to know what’s special about the Deluxe, it came standard with a larger fuel tank, radial tires, a “heater-defroster” (which is just a small oil cooler under the dash without any sort of fan or ductwork; it accomplishes very little beyond increasing the overall oil capacity), and deluxe instrumentation (which means nothing to me, as I’ve never seen any variation). The Deluxe also was supposed to come standard with reverse but the company never got around to developing reverse. Any of these were available as extra-cost options on the base model, too, except of course the entirely speculative reverse. Other options for any Freeway were a sunroof, spare tire (I’ve never seen one and I’m not sure where it would go), CB radio, AM radio, AM/FM radio, and any special color other than the standard red, yelllow, or orange. Interiors could be had in red, yellow, beige, black, or dark brown, although I don’t know that I’ve ever seen an original interior that wasn’t black. The most expensive single option was the CB at $175, with the AM/FM radio a close second at $165. Most of the other options were either $75 or $95 apiece.

    1. It seems fairly obvious that a spare tire would go where it does on most cars, where the luggage goes. So, in this case, over the rear window?

      1. My guess is that the spare was shipped sitting in the seat and was meant to be kept at home for retrieval when needed, simply as a way of getting the Freeway back on the road without waiting for repair or replacement of a damaged tire or wheel. That would also explain why no jack or lug wrench was included.

      1. The dozen or so that I’ve seen all have had an ammeter, an oil temperature gauge, and a fuel gauge in addition to the speedo cluster, no more, no less. It may just be that pretty much the entire production run ended up being “deluxe” when the company realized it was more trouble than it was worth to make two different versions.

    1. Thanks for posting the photo! If you ever get a chance to speak with the owner or at least to have a closer look at it, please do find out more, particularly concerning the engine and the front suspension/steering. I’ll warn you, though, that some of the people who have these can be a little weird.

  5. How practical would a 650cc dirt bike engine swap be? Or would that result i a lethal amount of horsepower?

    1. Such swaps have been performed. It’s a bit tricky making everything fit but those who have done so seem happy with the results.

      Cooling can be problematic, though. Even the example Jeff saw has a rather large additional vent just below the rear side window. I wouldn’t be surprised to learn there’s another one on the other side facing forward to encourage cross-flow.

  6. I bot one but it won’t start
    Looking for info as to why and help to make it run 1982 gas

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 64 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop files here