Practicality and fun don’t have to be mutually exclusive. In fact, I’ve always harbored the opinion that one of the reasons that Ford’s Mustang at times outsold the Chevy Camaro and Pontiac Firebird combined, and outlived both as a continuing model, was because its roomier cabin and trunk. That, as well as wider range of available engines increased its appear across a broader audience. You’ll note that the current retro-mod Camaro channels the earlier, smaller and more up-right cars and not the sleek but lugubrious later models.
When it comes to sports cars, especially those for the extremely well to do, practicality is usually the first attribute to be omitted in the pursuit of sex appeal and performance. You might have at some time or another seen a Lamborghini Countach owner attempt to back his car up, and act that frequently involves popping the door open and sitting on the sill like a catamaran captain. Sure it gets the job done, but practical? Ask him when it’s raining cats and dogs.
I happen to like practicality in all my cars, even the sporty ones. I appreciate the fact that the 240Z has a huge hatch and a commodious load area behind the seats, a feature that its contemporary, the Opel GT, couldn’t offer. It also provides this practicality without loss of its sportiness or capability, a pretty cool feat. That’s just one example of a sports car that didn’t ignore function over form, but what about the utmost in that pairing? What do you think has been history’s most practical sports car?
Image source: The Samba Forums
Leave a Reply