Let’s face it, even cities built around the automobile – like Los Angeles – are still a pain to get through by car. And when you consider the narrow thoroughfares, quaint cobblestone paving, and maze-like cartography of some of the world’s oldest and most densely populated urban landscapes, well, it makes investing in a good pair of shoes look like a good idea.
I’ve had the pleasure and challenge of driving in most of the biggest name cities in the US; San Francisco, Chicago, San Diego, Philadelphia, Washington DC, etc, as well as the aforementioned LA where going pretty much anywhere requires a check of the traffic to determine if it’s even possible. For most of these metro environs, getting past them is made easier by ring roads and highway bypasses, while getting anywhere downtown still requires steely nerves and a lot of time on your hands. Double that if you need to find parking.
As I noted, there are basically two types of metropolis – those whose major construction period post-dated the advent of the auto, and those whose was before. Each offers auto access but the pain point for drivers is elevated in the older cities, countered somewhat by all the timeless architecture you can view while stuck in traffic. Even most modern cities lack the infrastructure to support the volume of traffic presently thrown at them on a daily basis. Today, I want to know, in your experience, which city has been the most painful in which to drive.
Image source: Fifties50s
Leave a Reply