By Robert Emslie
Parity is a great thing. Back in October, Rhode Island’s St. George’s High School forfeited a football game against Saint Lawrence Academy of Massachusetts due to the incredible disparity in size between the two teams’ players. Saint Lawrence’s front line averages an NFL-like 300 pounds, meaning that St George’s would have to pretty much spend the game playing in their opponents’ shadows, as well as risk potential injury in the inevitable rout.
Racing is much like that, there’s not much fun in watching mismatched cars overcome the drivers’ skill. That’s why single marque racing series are so much fun. Having all the cars at a single baseline puts the onus of performance solely on the skill of the drivers, and can make for some pretty thrilling racing. Lots of cars – mostly big-ticket ones – have their own racing series, cars like the Maserati Coupe, Ferrari’s 430 Scuderia and even the Corvette.
But those are all racing series for people with money – a species rumored to exist, but rarely seen in the wild. What we want to know is what car out there today – whether cheap or not so – deserves its own exclusive racing series? Members Only jackets may be totally ’80s, but members-only racing series are still popular today. They are however not so popular that every car that deserves one, has one.
So, Yaris or Taurus, coupe or sedan, or maybe even adding a little sport to sport utilities, what car – that doesn’t already have one – should have its own racing series?
Image source: [fancytuning.com]
Jeff Glucker
The Prius needs its own series. The drivers' skills would be highlighted driving that pig.
There already is a one-make Prius series in Japan (but it's more an economy run than a race).
Do you know what it's called? Do you think it's on Youtube?
Prius Cup: http://green.autoblog.com/2009/02/04/toyota-deale…
It's run by Toyota for its dealers- dealership staff compete to see how fast they can service the cars at pit stops.
Raptor Racing Series!
Again, the Raptor proves to be the correct answer.
Ford E-series vans. Road courses only. Unlimited engine modifications, tires and suspension must be stock.
I like it. Can we require them to use only the 15-passenger extended versions?
Of course.
While hauling 15 passengers for the entire race?
The 15 passengers are the pit crew. Instead of going into the pit lane, drivers just pull over and the pit crews get out and get to work.
I like where this is going.
Yes, there will be groups of 15 rotated between the different vans:
Hyperactive Daycare Tots (with all the free candy from the sponsors)
The Have Mercy Senior Citizen Choir (who will be singing the entire time)
20 assorted day laborers/painters (after a nice 12 hour workday in the sun for that special aroma)
A Tourets group from the center
etc.
Would we want that to be a single marque, or have those running against Chevy Express vans? I'd even go as far as to have a separate class with Transit Connects running simultaneously.
Chevy Express is welcome, maybe even Dodge/Mercedes/Freightliner Sprinter vans, but high roof, long wheel base versions only.
No rear window cargo versions only.
I'm thinking the series could be sponsored by M&M Mars, Nestle, of Herseys. Every van could have free candy in the pit area.
The series could be sponsored by Nelson Mandela.
<img src="http://rlv.zcache.com/free_nelson_mandela_tshirt-p235835882830399319qw9y_400.jpg">
Almost spec econoline, transit van racing!
<img src="http://ll.speedhunters.com/u/f/eagames/NFS/speedhunters.com/Images/2010%20Brooks%203/Random%20Snap/Van_01.jpg" width="600"> http://speedhunters.com/archive/2010/11/14/random…
The Dodge vans get around in Japan too.
<img src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4057/4246005700_571a212265_o.jpg" width="600"> http://forums.vwvortex.com/showthread.php?4713713
I think I like the Transit van better than the Transit they sell here. Now after seeing that pic, it's even more true.
The Transit Connect has almost nothing to do with the big Transit.
…but I, for one, would not mind if the Transit replaced the E-van.
Oh, I'd rather allow chopped-and-channeled bodies, and lowered suspension. But stock frames..
Cadillac CTS-V, wagons only. What was the last station wagon racing series you can remember?
Was there any? Only station wagon I can remember racing was this..
<img src="http://www.retrobike.co.uk/forum/files/volvo_850_btcc_240.jpg">
That is going into the wallpaper folder.
More recently…
<img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1a/Subaru_Wagon_Racing-2.jpg" width=500>
Wagons are a preferred bodystyle in lots of demolition derbies, but typically they compete against a variety of other cars.
<img src="http://myblackbrick.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/volvo-240-demo-derby.jpg">
Damn them, I need those front bumper trim pieces for my (same-colour-blue) 244.
Anyway, from the demolition derbies I attended as a kid, wagons had a tendency to fold downward after repeated rear impact unless the roof was previously 'bent' like this car's; this would then drag in the dirt/mud and limit the car's movements. Sedans folded upward in the rear – many long-hood-long-deck full-size cars ended up banana-shaped by the end of the derbies. Of course, a wagon with the roof bent so as to encourage the rear to properly head upward offered the most integrity of any option.
You're not making it easier not to paint Securicor livery on my 745Ti.
Ahem.
<img src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4031/4325329719_296b78ff21_z.jpg?zz=1">
Rolls Royce Phantom rallying, the chauffeur drives and the passenger in the back provides pace notes.
Grey Poupon as main sponsors, obviously.
It has been done, sort of. I think it was just a RR body on a 4X4 truck frame.
<img src="http://www.coches20.com/wp-content/uploads/rolls-royce-rally.jpg"width=400>
A little more four wheel drift in the next corner, Jeeves.
<img src="http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5090/5275424741_21f4f18787.jpg" width="500" height="354" alt="70 World Cup Rally Martin-Martin-Martin Rolls Royce Silver Cloud" />
photo from the 1970 London-Mexico World Cup Rally
I'm thinking a two-make series, along the lines of V8 Supercars. Get a bit of a rivalry going.
<img src="http://www.autogaul.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/2010-maybach-zeppelin-1.jpg" width="500">
I've never seen a stretched Rover 75 in two-tone paint with German plates before…
CR-Z. Give 'em bigger battery packs and strip the interiors to compensate, basic stuff like intake/header/exhaust and a race gas tune, sticky tires and adjustable coilovers. It would be a contest of suspension setup, momentum preservation, battery life management, lots of fun and probably cheap too!
GOOD NEWS!
The Dacia Sandero already has it's own one-make racing series.
<img src="http://ploader.net/files/eb7790f3c079d4386382added3136dfa.jpg">
Nice-handling, affordable cars I'd want to race myself:
– Suzuki Kizashi
– Kia Forte Koup
– Mazda2
Crazy stuff that I'd actually make a special trip to the track to watch:
– Ford Transit Connect
– Ford Flex
– Jaguar XKR
Honda and Mazda are currently working with the SCCA and NASA to put together a B-spec series, featuring the Mazda2 and the Honda Fit, and possibly expanding to include the Yaris, Accent, and Versa. I can't expect they'd cost any more to get into than a Spec Focus or Miata.
And not the Sonic?
Not yet, at least. It would be an interesting contender.
Dang you hoonibles!
<img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/12/b-spec-announcement.jpg" width="500">
Bring it, bitches!
<img src="http://www.oneighturbo.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/web-volkwagen-polocup100-040708.jpg">
Outta my way, I'm coming through….
<img src="http://ploader.net/files/38b90383fc6f7a37591084bc13be1d03.jpg">
<img src="http://www.topgear.com/uk/assets/cms/f7444c7b-b875-4548-81c2-d922eac5f037/Large%20Image.jpg?p=101008_03:46" width="500">
Just because I want to see some people actually get upset when there's a wreck.
Reminds me of Fast/Crash Masters from the 1990s. Jaguar XJ220s on a 1/4 mile oval/road course.
<img src="http://www.racingsportscars.com/photo/1993/Indianapolis-1993-07-10-010.jpg"width=500> <a href="http://www.racingsportscars.com/photo/1993/Indianapolis-1993-07-10-010.jpg” target=”_blank”>http://www.racingsportscars.com/photo/1993/Indianapolis-1993-07-10-010.jpg
Thinking about a Smart-only racing series reminded me of this.[youtube VhteNsqjlxA http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VhteNsqjlxA youtube]
Morgan 3-wheeler:
<img src="http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/autopia/2010/11/new_Morgan_Threewheeler_01.jpg">
Underpowered and unsafe!
When I take over the world, there will be a spec class for the Cyrobuka.
<img src="http://www.tanshanomi.com/temp/cyrobuka_web.jpg">
Add in the Reliant Robin for a two-make series.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQh56geU0X8
The new Morgan is based on the Ace from Liberty Motors, which is to say about 100 hp pushing a little over 1000 pounds, giving 0-60 mph in around 4.5 seconds. That doesn't strike me as particularly underpowered. As for safety, my personal automotive standards are notoriously lax, but one can always wear a helmet if that's a concern.
<img src="http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5290/5364516159_d77902662d.jpg" width="450">
Jeep Compass – mostly because it'd be something to redeem a very unloved car, but also, with 4WD, not too much weight (for a modern car of that size), and the potential to drop in a handful of different turbo engines, it could be pretty fun. Really, it should be the Patriot for better visibility, but it gets just enough begrudging respect.
If by "grudging respect", you mean "$4 higher resale value", then yes.
Sadly, the platform for those things is just so shoddy, I don't think it would be able to hold up to a race series. They're just that bad.
Well, there's usually the acknowledgement they're available with low-range (although the Compass is now too).
As for the platform, it's sort of related to the Mitsubishi Lancer (I suppose about as much as the Lebaron GTC was to the Plymouth Voyager) – how bad could it be, if you threw enough money at it?
You say that as if the Mitsubishi Lancer were a particularly good platform.
Not exactly, but they throw enough money at it to give us the Evo.
If they'd just kick that nasty World Engine and CVT out of the engine bay, the Compass would be a lot less bad. I spent a week driving an '09 rental while on vacation that year, and despite the motor's considerable NVH and the CVT's jerky engagement, it wasn't nearly as bad I had been led to believe it would be.
I think it's telling when the highest praise anyone can come up with for the Caliber/Compass/Patriot cars is some variation on, "I expected it to be so horrendous it would make me vomit just by being its general vicinity. To my surprise, I was actually able to drive the car, and only vomited twice! It's far better than I expected!"
I think I'd do better than that:
"This is a potentially satisfying vehicle that was ruined by the small details. Assuming that the entire drivetrain can be thought of as a 'small detail.'"
While anything on the Caliber platform is a horrible vehicle: loud, ugly, weird transmission, etc. They do seem to possess an unusual amount of mechanical reliability. My father was cursed with a Caliber as a company car. He drives 30k-40k miles a year, a fair amount in the mountains. His Caliber has gone 100k+ miles with only oil changes. Even the brake pads are still good. It rides and drives just as crappy now as the day it was new.
As much as Consumer Reports loves to hate the Chrysler GS-platform cars, they've repeatedly rated the Compass as "above average" in reliability.
"As much as Consumer Reports loves to hate the Chrysler GS-platform cars, they've repeatedly rated the Compass as "above average" in reliability."
rescue attempt
Chevy Aveo. If they are on the track then at least they are not on the road.
It's a good argument…
Cadillac DTS. Really doesn't drive as badly as you think, and it would bring a lot of, uh, maturity to the racing world.
Sign Life Alert, Denny's and Depends as sponsors and you're good to go.
"I've crashed and I can't get up!"[youtube bQlpDiXPZHQ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bQlpDiXPZHQ youtube]
GM = Grand Marquis.
Before I figured this out I thought you were talking about the other GM out of nowhere. But here I go flunking reading comprehension again.
When he said GM, I thought he was talking about 9C1's
Ooh. 9C1 series. I'd watch although it would have to be opened to platform-mates like the Fleetwood and Roadmaster just to keep from depleting the short supply of police spec Caprices.
Destruction derby with these:
<img src="http://cache.jalopnik.com/assets/resources/2007/09/Excalibur.jpg">
Prius Racing League:
Class for hypermiling
Class for flat out speed
Class for combined speed/economy
Unlimited class
Not that I've thought about this before…
Hearse racing? I'm a bit biased, but if Lemons can do it anyone can.. right?
All funeral cars including flower cars allowed. If a hearse, overall length must exceed stock dimension. Unlimited engine mods. Suspension left original, so as not to 'disturb the interred' in the back of course.
[youtube cAG-D3XFwYM http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cAG-D3XFwYM youtube]
I like it. Gimme a '69 Commercial Chassis Caddy, with a built 472, gutted interior, and adapted Chevy truck Rancho suspension bits, and I'll kick some ass.
Chrysler LHS. Why? I just bought a `96. Dear god, what have I done?
Think of it this way – if it's survived 15 years, you've probably got a decent one. Budget for tie rods, and it's a pleasant car.
The early LH cars, while boaty and cursed with horribly cramped engine compartments, aren't horrible. I can think of a lot of worse 1990s cars.
You guys have made me feel better already!
…and actually, I'd make the case that the 93-97s are better than the 98-04s in a number of key aspects (overall reliability being one; however the emissions control systems on the earlier cars can be troublesome, depending on your local regulations).
Ford Falcon Utes. More specifically, the chassis cab kind:
<img src="http://www.countrycars.com.au/centralwest/getImage.php?size=l&ref=5942859" width="500">
Since spec racing can be a bit boring with cars that look the same, sound the same, you are required to place 50 kilos (non-detachable during the race, of course) in the back in the form of whatever-you-want. Bonus points for those who build with creativity. Actually, it's sounding kinda like LeMons now…
Let's see some full size pickups, and I mean 350/3500/3500, diesels/duallys only. Races will take place in rally, road, street, circle and drag events. Winner gets a free car wash to get soot off their rig. Engine and suspension limited to stock.
I could get behind this if the aftertreatment system has to stay stock too. (Without the emissions systems, you don't have a stock engine… and maybe it would get the guys who think having a truck that chokes everyone for 1/2 mile behind them is cool to realize that they're doing their hobby more harm than good.)
I can't think of any but between their popularity in non-spec series and their expense relative to other spec-class cars like old Miatas, Focii, and E30s, I'm not too surprised. They still did pretty well without needing a walled garden.
I'm still game for the 24 Hours of Sebrings, should LeMons ever get old.
I think the Tata Nano was born to be a spec series. Slow and cheap – just the thing for newb racers.
There's a Spec S2000 class new this year- old one have finally become (almost) affordable for racecar conversion. It's going to be… interesting. Like Spec Miata at double speed.
With way more spinning.
A Sleeper Spec series. I'm talking K-cars, Fairmonts, Citations, Geos.
A set list of models like these, maybe cars that came stock with base engines having less than ~125hp. Unlimited modifications allowed to drivetrain and suspension. The only limitation is that they have to appear completely stock from the outside, down to hubcaps, aerodynamics etc. A further limitation could limit the vehicles to a stock engine block but it would be cool to see what could be stuffed under the hood of these things. Safety equipment and tires would be the only allowed deviations from the factory 'look'.
<img src="http://cache.jalopnik.com/assets/resources/2007/04/le_baron.jpg"> Image lifted from that other car blog.
That could be pretty awesome, though it sounds like a version of NASCAR i'd watch.
Fairmonts and naturally-aspirated Volvo 240/740/940s would pretty much dominate, I assume. Make mine my summer-driver 244, but turbocharged and with a T5 bolted in (the stock Volvo manuals aren't the strongest). Having classes by final number of cylinders would help keep things competitive – it's easier to build a strong and small-block Ford or Chevy than to get the same power out of most streetable, reliable four-cylinders – but then again, limiting it to stock engine blocks would have the same effect while encouraging junkyard turbocharging and other shenanigans (and even if forced induction was outlawed, a formerly-8v Volvo with a 16v head out of a 740 GLE could still compete well with the right suspension modifications and a skilled driver).
I like these ideas. Maybe different classes for different layouts, fwd/rwd/awd and whatever. Or maybe just a rule that a car cannot deviate from it's factory layout. But part of me would love seeing a turbocharged awd Chevy Celebrity that appears stock.