Encyclopedia Hoonatica: Under Multiple Flags

By Peter Tanshanomi Feb 15, 2016

EH-HUSQVARNA-Nations
[EDIT: Either I didn’t explain this very well, or my text is TL;DR. This question is about vehicles in which both the brand ownership and production packed up and moved from “Country A” to “Country B”. Hope this helps.]
This past week, I had the opportunity to explain the convoluted — some may say tortured — history of the Husqvarna motorcycle. “Husky’s” headquarters and manufacturing facilities were based in their eponymous Swedish town for 84 years, until the motorcycle manufacturing branch was sold to the Castiglioni brothers’ Cagiva/MV Agusta concern. Suddenly, Husqvarna was an Italian-owned marque manufacturing bikes in Varese. Production remained in Italy while the marque’s ownership was passed around, first to Harley-Davidson, then BMW. However, after again being sold to Pierer Industrie AG, KTM’s parent company, production moved to Mattighofen, Austria. This move now made Husqvarna an Austrian-owned, Austrian-manufactured brand.
I share all this because it led me to today’s Encyclopedia entry: Vehicles of many nations. Can you name another vehicle brand that has been simultaneously headquartered and manufactured in two or more nations in its history?
The Caveats (there are always caveats):

  • Being owned and manufactured in different countries doesn’t count. International manufacturing alliances, multinational corporate holdings, and captive import branding have resulted in a quagmire we just don’t need to get into. (Mini, anyone?) I want you to name brands that have been unquestionably based in two or more particular nations: that means the boardroom big-wigs and at least some assembly-line production, at the same time.
  • We are identifying “brand” by the marque (the brand name under which a vehicle is marketed to the public) not the name of the parent company. (e.g., Dodge is a marque, FCA is a corporate parent.)
  • Cars, light trucks, heavy-duty trucks, and motorcycles are all fair game. Airplanes are go this week, just because I’m personally curious what might come up there. I’m nixing boats and ships because those guys are just an incestuous stew of tax evasion and politics.

Difficulty: Wrench-benders: 7+; History nerds: probably no higher than 3-4.
How This Works: Read the comments first and don’t post duplicates! Bonus points for adding photos.
Image Sources: 1994, 2004 & 2016 Husqvarna sales brochures.

By Peter Tanshanomi

Tanshanomi is Japanese [単車のみ] for "motorcycle(s) only." Though primarily tasked with creating two-wheel oriented content for Hooniverse, Pete is a lover of all sorts of motorized vehicles.

0 thoughts on “Encyclopedia Hoonatica: Under Multiple Flags”
      1. I still don’t think I understand.
        Is it owned in country A and built in A and later owned in B and built in B, or does it need to be owned in A and B while built in A and B?

    1. Or the Texas company that bought the inventory and plans (with the passage of the new law exempting certain low-production new builds of historic models from having to meet modern regulations) to make “new” Deloreans?

        1. According to Wikipedia, in 1995 some guy in Liverpool bought the name rights and al leftover parts inventory.

  1. Here’s a twist: Bugatti was started in Molsheim (and still exists there under VW ownership). However, when it started in 1909, Molsheim was in Germany. Then, after WW2 the Alsace region was returned to France.
    After going defunct in the 1960s, Bugatti was reborn as Bugatti Automobili S.p.A. in Modena, Italy. This venture went belly up in the early 1990s and Volkswagen bought it in 1995 and began production of new Bugattis in 1998. The original factory in Molsheim was under new ownership, so a new factory was built nearby and Bugatti’s headquarters were returned to France, but now under German ownership.
    So, to recap, Bugatti is a German then French then Italian company who is currently located in France, but owned by Germans.

    1. Fun fact : the original door from the Molsheim plant is still preserved inside the Bugatti Automobili factory in Modena. I think i read somewhere that it’s the only thing left from the original Bugatti factory.
      http://media.autoblog.it/l/lex/lex-stabilimento-bugatti-di-campogalliano/th/campogalliano-bugatti-plant-16.jpg
      fun fact 2 : Romano Artioli, founder of Bugatti Automobili, was also (briefly) the owner of Lotus. The Elise was named after his granddaughter.

  2. General Dynamics purchased Steyr-Daimler-Puch Spezialfahrzeuge and produces the Pandur II APC for the Portuguese army. Not sure if the Steyr branding persists, however.

  3. Here’s another two-wheeled example: Norton motorcycles. From 1902–92, they were a British-built product with a British owned brand name. In 2002, American Kenny Dreer bought rights to all the intellectual pieces of the old Norton brand and produced Norton motorcycles in Oregon until 2006. After production ceased, he sold the Norton name back to a British owner, and new Nortons are being manufactured in England at Donington. It was all British, then all American, then all British again.
    http://pic20.picturetrail.com/VOL1461/6266009/20225943/332254382.jpg

    1. Considering GMs recent history in failing mightily at selling brands, I;m gonna say it’ll end up like Saturn, Pontiac, Saab and Hummer instead of moving anywhere.

    1. Other than that weird affair with BMW that everybody wants to forget, they’ve only been a badge share since KTM bought them. But the Husqvarna models have better suspenders and rear swingarm than their KTM equivalents, so there’s still good reason to buy them over their KTM twins.

    2. They may share a platform with KTMs now, but that doesn’t change the fact that Huskvarna -> Varese -> Mattighofen were clearly production moves.
      Also I would not describe current Huskys as “badge engineered.” This certainly is not a carbon copy of the 390 Duke:

  4. If future probable (or maybe vaporware) developments count, then De Tomaso, says Wikipedia:
    “In 2014 the original workshop in Modena was in abandonment.— In April 2015 an Italian bankruptcy court approved the sale of the company to China’s Consolidated Ideal TeamVenture, for a mere 1.05 million euros, or approximately $1.17 million USD.[9] Per that sale report “A lawyer for the buyer announced that Ideal TeamVenture plans to produce cars in China bearing the De Tomaso name.” 🙁 sadface

        1. Production re-started in China, before re-starting (?) in the UK. And the new models that are “made in Longbridge” are assembled from components wholly imported from China.
          This one may need to go to a Steward’s Enquiry…

          1. Yeah, I forgot that they moved the HQ and production back to the UK. However, they did originally move to China after the buyout.

  5. Among the many horrible iterations of the Avanti II, in 2006 the whole operation was moved to Cancun, Mexico.

  6. How about offshoots that outlived the parent company? Specifically Willys cars lived on in Brazil long after the Willys name was dead in the US.

  7. Talbot.
    http://www.talbot-london.com/pictures/talbot_wappen.jpg
    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/bs/thumb/f/ff/Talbot-Lago_Logo.jpg/200px-Talbot-Lago_Logo.jpg
    Talbot was founded in England in 1903. In 1919 it was taken over by French-based British-financed Darracq. The Darracq brand was phased out in favour of Talbot, resulting in a dual nationality Talbot company. Talbot-Darracq went on to merge with Sunbeam, but the group collapsed during the depression. The British part was taken over by the Rootes Group called their new acquisition Sunbeam-Talbot. The French part was taken over by Antonio Lago, who called his cars Talbot-Lagos.
    Eventually Rootes phased out the Talbot part of the name so from 1955 the British cars were simply Sunbeams. Talbot-Lago meanwhile was taken over by Simca who killed off the brand. Both Simca and Rootes were subsequently taken over by Chrysler, and then again by Peugeot. Peugeot were looking for single brand for the Rootes and Simca models they had inherited so chose Talbot because it would appeal to British and French buyers equally. As it turned out it didn’t really appeal to either and the brand was dead again by the early 1990s.

  8. I don’t know if DeSoto counts.
    As I’m sure we all know, DeSoto started out as a sub-brand of Chrysler in 1928 and built cars until 1961:
    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/5d/1956_De_Soto_Firedome_2-door_hardtop_front.JPG/1280px-1956_De_Soto_Firedome_2-door_hardtop_front.JPG
    However, the brand was also used by Chrysler on trucks for export. There was a joint venture with some Turkish companies building DeSoto and Fargo trucks in Turkey for the local market. The Turkish investors bought out Chrysler, and the brand is now owned by the Turkish company Askam, which still builds DeSoto trucks in Turkey:
    http://img03.blogcu.com/v2/images/editor/v/e/z/vezirogluotomotiv/923331464507607_1260799465.jpg

    1. That fits perfectly. An American-owned brand being built in the US, and eventually a Turkish brand built in Turkey. Just the sort of situation I was looking for.

      1. Not quite the same, but the Ford Transit Connect is built in Turkey and imported to the US, where the seats and seat belts are ripped out of the cargo versions.

  9. Ford before the whole “One Ford” initiative. They were independently developing cars in GB that we never got here, starting with the Model Y in 1932 through to the recent Mondeo before it morphed into the fusion.
    Requisite cossy

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 64 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop files here