Crap… Has Land Rover wrecked the Defender?

By Jeff Glucker Oct 3, 2018
 

 
 
 
 
 
View this post on Instagram
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

Disguised Land Rover Defender. Was just having the conversation a few days ago where we discussed how “people are worried” that Gerry McGovern doesn’t have the chops to pull off a proper Defender. He can do Velars and Range Rovers—all wonderfully pretty—but he screwed up the new Discovery by removing all outward signs of grit. The old Defender was made from 90% grit, 10% piss and vinegar. It can’t look soft. If this vehicle is any indication, rough seas ahead. Looks like they ironed out an LR4. Over square, to put it mildly. But perhaps the camp is obscuring the shape? What do you think? #landrover #defender @landrover 🇬🇧🤔🤔🤔🇬🇧 #best4x4xfar

A post shared by Jonny Lieberman (@jonnylieberman) on


Our old pal Jonny Lieberman posted camo-clad photos of a Land Rover Defender development car. It was likely trotting around the Gaydon roads as it’s being put through its paces before a final upcoming reveal. This is a big vehicle for Land Rover, as the Defender has been an iconic symbol of the brand for decades. While we’re fine with the stylistic direction applied to the Land Rover and warmed up to the looks of the Discovery, I’m not sure a “softer” Defender will work.
http://hooniverse.info/2017/10/12/the-latest-land-rover-discovery-summed-up-in-less-than-five-minutes/
In fact, I’m pretty sure of it.
Mercedes-Benz knew it couldn’t cut off the edges of its G-Class. The German automaker made it better, but it never lost sight of the original appeal of that particular Military-bred machine. The same should be true of the Defender, but now I fear that won’t be the case.
And that’s a damn shame.

By Jeff Glucker

Jeff Glucker is the co-founder and Executive Editor of Hooniverse.com. He’s often seen getting passed as he hustles a 1991 Mitsubishi Montero up the 405 Freeway. IG: @HooniverseJeff

14 thoughts on “Crap… Has Land Rover wrecked the Defender?”
  1. Given how aggressive the cammo flares out at the C-Pillar, I’m cautiously optimistic that this bares nearly no resemblance to the production model, and it’s largely fake. I know we’re not getting away from some aero trimming, but that’s too obscured to make a fair judgement just yet.
    Although, realistically, if you can still get it with rubber floors and not an excess of electronics (in other words, if it remains a utilitarian fleet-grad vehicle), I’m willing to overlook some disappointing styling.

    1. The entire hood and the doors down to rub strip level (where they would go if they still existed) are heavily padded.
      From this I’m tipping it looks like a Discovery with bigger wheel arch flares, basically another matryoshka doll generic Land Rover.
      I’m not confident of a work spec version, let alone live axle/s or a pickup. Probably not even a swb, which was the very first Land Rover that this thing is theoretically continuing…

  2. Why couldn’t they just restyle the original defender, a little better aero updates, use aluminum frame, composite body, 4 and 6 cylinder turbo engines and minimal electronic luxuries. Why make yet another range rover LR4 blah blah blah? Those things are not off road worthy utilitarian rigs.

    1. Possibly too much ‘from scratch’ and the Jeep and Landcruiser 70 series between them have the market fairly well catered for. They do leave a fair opportunity for a proper new Defender, but the business case would by no means be a no-brainer IMO.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 64 MB. You can upload: image. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop files here