2010 Nissan 370Z Roadster

2010 370Z Roadster
2010 370Z Roadster

“Top down, chrome spinnin’…” or in this case, it would be the 19” lightweight alloy wheels wrapped in high-performance Bridgestone Potenza tires; 245 in the front and large 275s strapped to the back. The song continues that “you see the boss grinnin’…” and I am doing more than grinnin’. I am behind the wheel of the 2010 Nissan 370Z Roadster – smilin’ because this is one convertible sports car that gets it all just right.
The 2010 370Z Roadster is the positive evolutionary step forward away from the drop-top version of the 350Z. The previous model looked awkward and was uncomfortable to sit in for periods of time lasting longer than 2 minutes. However, it did get the sports car part correct. This new iteration has great exterior style, doesn’t make my spine cry for mercy, and takes the sporty part of the equation to another level.

2010 Nissan 370Z roadster road rear close
Growing in size and power output, the engine in the 370Z Roadster is now 3.7L (up from the previous 306 hp 3.5L V6) producing 332 hp and 270 lb-ft of torque. Nissan sent this Z to the set of the Biggest Loser and it came back 150 lbs lighter. For those scoring at home, this 2010 370Z Roadster has more power and less weight than the old model. It is faster and all-around more fun to drive. The popular new Synchro-Rev transmission system is employed here and makes me feel like Ayrton Senna even if I am still just Johnny Fat Feet (I know the clip is in Japanese but watch what this man could do with a car). When I downshift, the engine and transmission work together allowing me to extract every last bit of driving excitement from this vehicle.

Rather than harping on old vs. new, I think you should see how this ragtop stacks up against the competition. How would you feel if I told you this is a Nissan that was designed to run with Porsches? You read that correctly – this sub $40K convertible sports car keeps pace with the Porsche Boxster which starts at $46,600. The base price of the 370Z Roadster is $36,970. In all fairness, the Z can be optioned out to the tune of $48K+ … however the Porsche can be optioned into the stratosphere. I tested it out myself and built up a base Boxster to the tune of $72,900 – good thing I didn’t start with the $56K+ Boxster S!

2010 Nissan 370Z roadster interior
The interior of the Roadster is a nice place to be on short drives and on long drives, which is a huge change from the previous model. The Bose sound system works well, but the real aural pleasure is derived when the top is down and the VQ engine is howling through the exhaust. The VQ exhaust note has a love-it-or-hate-it quality, but I think it sounds great in the upper range RPM range. The available navigation system mimics the one found in the more expensive Infiniti side of the family.

There are only two areas of the interior with which I found immediate faults; the gas gauge and the floor near the gas pedal. The gas gauge has been covered ad-nauseam by most automotive outlets. It is an interesting concept that doesn’t work well in reality. A row of dots in a line is not enough information for me to process how full or, for the pessimistic bunch, how empty my fuel tank is. Thankfully I can have my remaining mileage displayed on the small screen located below the gauge. The other issue I mentioned is the floor near the gas pedal. There is a section of the pedal that juts out and forces me to place my foot on the pedal at an angle. If I don’t then my heel rests uncomfortably on this protuberance. It is not a big issue, but more of a minor annoyance.

2010 Nissan 370Z roadster office side top up
The exterior style of this 370Z is leaps and bounds over the previous generation convertible. The 350Z Roadster comes off a design after-thought whereas this
new version was designed from the outset with a drop-top in mind. It looks handsome with the top up and gorgeous with the top down. The flowing shoulder line appears to become even more embellished when the top is neatly stowed.

Quite often a convertible suffers from a serious case of the shakes. Hit a bump in the road and you can feel the front and rear of the car reacting apart from each other. Nissan has done an excellent job of stiffening the already quite stiff 370Z to eliminate as much of this as possible and the result is readily apparent. The car feels solid and reacts well to changing road environments. The ride is the perfect mix of sporty stiff and slow-jaunt relaxed, it is certainly not the high-performance NISMO version but it is no slouch.

2010 Nissan 370Z roadster rear wide road
The 2010 Nissan 370Z Roadster is a convertible sports car that gets both parts of the equation correct. The interior volume, both noise and space, are good with the top up or down. The car feels tight and constantly yearns for me to take it on another run through the local canyon roads. The base price for all this fun is $36,970 with the 370Z Roadster pictured here topping out a hair over the $40,000 mark. Nissan has created a convertible sports car that wears the iconic Z badge well. The only way they could top it would be to listen to my endless letters asking for the return of T-Tops…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 64 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop files here

  1. JeepyJayhawk Avatar

    Lunch-break test drive? I think so.

    1. Jeff Glucker Avatar
      Jeff Glucker

      Go for it! Tell us what you think if you do..

  2. skitter Avatar

    Assuming the lights are bright enough, I think drivers will get used to the fuel gauge. Even with only three lines, I have a very good idea of my cellphone’s remaining battery life at any time.

    1. Jeff Glucker Avatar
      Jeff Glucker

      That is an excellent argument regarding the fuel gauge.
      Also, the display can show you how many miles you have left in the tank…
      This current display is certainly better than the Super-Fantastic Electric dash readouts of the old Z31…

  3. A strolling player Avatar

    My fuel gauge consists of twelve squares. It’s “full” for the first 150 miles or so and then steadily begins to drop; once the last light starts blinking, I have probably fifty or sixty miles to go.
    ‘Course, I typically just go off the MPG display, which conveniently includes a trip meter. 455 miles at 45.5 MPG? I’m under two gallons, I should fill.

  4. SSurfer321 Avatar

    Comparing the Z to a Boxter is kind of like comparing a cougar to a 20yr old.
    Sure both are fun but you’ll get better performance from the cougar while the 20yr old is just image conscious.

    1. Jeff Glucker Avatar
      Jeff Glucker

      Well… they are both two-passenger convertible sports cars and it should say a lot about how well the Nissan is made, if it is being referenced in the same space as the Porsche.
      Both cars are fun to drive – one leaves a lot more money in your bank account.

      1. SSurfer321 Avatar

        I wholly agree with you. I just fear for Nissan that the Z may not get a fair shake from the image conscious balding male shopping for the solution to his mid-life crisis .

        1. Jeff Glucker Avatar
          Jeff Glucker

          You might be right about that…

    2. small_e Avatar

      The cougar is also less maintenance, though it carries more baggage.
      Nissan. The Nissan is lower maintenance and carries more baggage.
      Luggage. The Nissan is lower maintenance and carries more luggage.

  5. superbadd75, enriched with vitamins and minerals. Avatar
    superbadd75, enriched with vitamins and minerals.

    My wife really liked the 350Z, but the 370 looks like it’s got it all over that car. My only problem is in the value equation. I just can’t seem to make myself give that much money for a car with only 2 seats, especially one with a “Nissan” badge on it. The options really add up quickly, taking the price to a very uncomfortable place for me. When we shopped cars this last time around, the Mustang GT just seemed to offer more bang for the buck to us, at least for our purposes. It may not be as agile, but it’s plenty good for daily use, especially if track days aren’t what you’re planning for it(although supposedly the 2010 Track Pack does pretty well). Still sounds like a nice car, just not for me. Nice read, Braff.

  6. superbadd75, enriched with vitamins and minerals. Avatar
    superbadd75, enriched with vitamins and minerals.

    I’ve seen these a few times, WTF is it?

  7. Elizabeth Avatar

    is a great poster, I always love to read what you encreve, on my site has also ums content and some news interesting. kisses , http://sensuaisegatas.blogspot.com