Last Call: A Dash of Class Edition

By Robert Emslie Mar 8, 2016

1984ChevroletCamaroBerlinettadigitaldash
Earlier today we discussed whether or not modern automobile interiors were dull as dishwater compared to those of earlier eras. As proof that they are, I give you the 1984 Chevy Camaro Berlinetta digital dash. Soak in its ’80s amazingness.
Last Call indicates the end of Hooniverse’s broadcast day.  It’s meant to be an open forum for anyone and anything. Thread jacking is not only accepted, it’s encouraged.
Image: Wired

0 thoughts on “Last Call: A Dash of Class Edition”
  1. I am weirdly uncomfortable with how much I like that freestanding stereo, given how irritated I am when designers can’t integrate modern screens into interiors properly.

    1. I walked away from a Mazda3 for that very reason – and yes, the Berlinetta radio/tape deck is awesome.

      1. Ah, bummer, you missed out not only on a superior chassis and car, but on the brilliance of Mazda designers who lowered the cowl of the dash and still put the screen at a convenient angle to the driver.
        Better luck next time!

        1. It was a competent car, indeed. It looked like they Velcro-ed a cheap Android tablet to the dash, though. Which actually would be a better idea, because it’s upgrade-able.

    2. when will automakers realize that instead of a screen with instantly outdated software, they can just give us a phone mount on articulated stalk
      http://antique-autoradio-madness.org/Blaupunkt/Blaup_87/Blaup-87-pub/Blaup-1987-Pub-Folder-Sylt-SQM-108_01.jpg
      and all of the control knobs and switches on a second articulated stalk
      http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-Bpb2aaYiZ0E/ToH1fjt-ZOI/AAAAAAAAFRc/Tsr6hF4hBjQ/s1600/2709_blaupunkt_08.jpg
      and a third articulated stalk with a bunch of flashing LEDs
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bY2NkrHpqUE

  2. I dare you to find one that still works. Lucas had nothing on ’80s GM electronics…

  3. A ribbon tachometer. Wow. And it’s illuminated? Small chance it’s LED? Obviously, being from the ’80s, it must be a vast improvement over those mechanical kludges from the ’70s…

      1. “Ribbon” is a strange term to define. I think we’d find that out in this theoretical EncycloHoon diversion. I would limit it to gauges that exhibited no trace of radial motion; though rotating parts would have to be allowed.
        Where the Torino in the video has an indicator that sweeps left to right while remaining vertical, it’s just a regular tachometer mechanism turned 90 degrees so its axis is vertical and its motion is in the horizontal. Likewise, the linear numbers on some dashboards were just swept by a regular, radial indicator.
        The Fintail that vega60 mentions comes closest to true, mechanical linear readout. I’m not sure how they were arranged, but in my ideal world the red part would be the area under a curve defined by the equation that defines the measuring instrument’s true motion. This would be printed on a scroll (a ribbon!) driven by the instrument. Much better for a fuel gauge than a speedo, though.
        My favorites are the ones where the indicator needle is fixed and the dial rotates behind it, as seen in a ship’s compass and many aircraft gauges. They’re like the Magic Eight Ball toys to me.

        1. Actually, from what I can see in the video it appears that the fintail speedo consists of a vertical axis rotating cylinder with a yellow/red triangle painted on it (yellow at the low end of the triangle, red at the taller end). Only a small portion of the cylinder/triangle is visible through the narrow rectangular sight glass.
          The numbers are printed on plastic (Bakelite?) that hides the rest of the cylinder.

  4. Want to rant about a diminuitive future? My local newspaper tested the DS4 Crossback yesterday, sort of Citroën’s premium hatchback, lifted 3cm. There’s no space in the rear doors, so one can’t open the rear windows. Car caught heavy flak for stupid development priorities on several corners. This paper has a happy, positive approach to all cars, usually, but this non-Citroën-badged Citroën fell flat through.
    http://www.carsuk.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/2016-Citroen-DS4-Crossback-1-1024×653.jpg

      1. Ugh, we had a Buick Century wagon with those terrible rear door windows (plus, useless vent wings). And of course, Dad being Dad, vinyl/no AC. Made for some seriously miserable summer road trips.

          1. That must have been painful. I’ve folded my adult self into the back seat of one of these a few times.

          2. I still think it’s a great-looking car, and although it must have been an exercise in misery at times, I bet it still provides some unforgettable family stories.

          3. Got to admit, when I posted the image yesterday, it was the first time it didn’t repulse me – and we’re 25 years in. I love roadtrips now and they had their bright side back then, too. My parents were car people, but of the cheap sort (eh, so am I). My mother pushed a Twingo to 182kph once, way out of its range. We could drive from Italy to Germany in one night, doing solid 3-digit-averages. First time in Scandinavia, being passed by a boxy 240 was a shock to my stepfather.

          1. Also, those rear vent windows aren’t terribly useful for vomiting out of, at least not at highway speeds.

  5. I love this dash! Side pods with lots of buttons. That stand alone stereo. Sporty wheel. 4 analogue gauges. Digital speedo and rev counter. And the pizza resistance (sic) the yellow section, straight out of KITT.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 64 MB. You can upload: image. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop files here