LT1-Powered Ferrari 250 – What's Your Take?

By Tim Odell Feb 12, 2010

1963 Ferrari 250GTE for sale
A few days ago on the ever-awesome Bring A Trailer, they covered the sale of a Ferrari 250GTE (that’s a relatively unloved 2+2 iteration of the 250 model) for a “mere” $38,000. The catch? Gone is the 3.0L v12 and manual transmission, replaced by an LT-1 and 700R4 slushbox.

1963 Ferrari 250GTE for sale
On one hand we loves us some crazy engine swaps. On the other, we loves us some V12s. We like the idea of horrifying Ferrari purists, but…really?700R4? That said, the LT-1 powered example would almost certainly run circles around a pristine ’63. Maybe view it as a project car, one in dire need of some better looking vintage speed goodies and a proper transmission…
1963 Ferrari 250GTE for sale
What say you?

47 thoughts on “LT1-Powered Ferrari 250 – What's Your Take?”
  1. I love the idea of horrifying the Ferraristi so. goddamn. much, but I just can't get on board with this one. It's done so half-assed that it's offensive to me as a Ferrari-hating hobbyist. There are SO many other relevant engines that would have been good options. For instance, as a nice "Screw You" to Ferraristi, a GT40 engine would be an insult of artistic proportions. This just comes across as ignorance.

      1. I'm thinking the ultimate engine swap insult would be the one litre of throbbing muscle out of my Metro. Three cylinders of… ah… shit, I don't know, certainly not power.

  2. The LT1 is no great crime, but it seems an LSX wouldn't have been that much more, even in 2005. The only possible excuse for the automatic is that it didn't require hacking into the Ferrari body parts. Would it have been THAT hard to put a T-5 or a Tremec in there?
    Personally, I would have tried to sell the Borranis to finance fixing the V-12 instead of ditching the V-12 for cash.

  3. I'd rock the shit out of that car. I'd make sure to hit every Ferrari "meet" I could and proudly pop the hood and watch people's heads explode in anger.
    Purists who get mad at people make me laugh. I enjoy watching them get all bent out of shape over stuff like that.

  4. I don't know how to feel. I love the LT1… I love V8 swaps. I'm no Ferrari aficionado. But something about this doesn't sit well with me. Its like that guy at the office who looks really nice, he seems to have a lot of normal hobbies, but when he looks at you, you get scared and run back to your cubicle.

  5. You just know that when 5:00 comes around, he's going to drive straight home and drown a puppy in the bathtub, just for the hell of it.

  6. You guys who are fantasizing about using this car to anger the Ferrari purists are giving waaaaay to much weight to the GTE's esteem in that community. THIS is the car they all cut up to build their Testa Rossa replicas.

  7. I'm not Ferrari enthusiast by any means, and I'm not that big of a purist. But I can't stand SBC engine swaps. It's been done so many times, and the original motor or a more exotic swap is just more interesting.
    So, no, I don't think this is sacrelige, just really, really dumb.

  8. Methinks the Ferrariati scoff at the 250GTE, so this swap probably wouldn't offend them any more than the rest of the car.
    But I still think it fails. If I were to do it, I'd rock a '60s 327 Vette mill with a lumpy cam, 850 Holley, and glass packs. And a four-speed transmission with a Hurst shifter. Then I'd do everything in my power to absolutely destroy that Italian piece of crap, use the unadulterated rage of the roaring V8 to tear it asunder. Because, really, this is one of the ugliest and shittiest Ferraris ever made and that LT1 would be better off in a Camaro.

  9. Quick internet research shows that a Ferrari 250 GTE weighs about 3100 pounds. Minus the V12, 2700 pounds. Usually a reasonably strong person can carry a manual transmission in their arms by themselves, so that can't be more than 100, 150 pounds. 2600 pounds is a bit too much car for a 'Busa swap.
    You know what that means…
    Turbo 'Busa swap!

  10. Considering that a new Chevy crate motor probably costs about the same as a tune up on the V-12, maybe including installation, this is a pretty wise choice. The engines are entirely different, but the proof in the pudding would be the relative weights of the mills, and a comparison of the HP and torque curves. Naturally, a slush box has no business in this car.

  11. I think it's about time someone took the blasphemy to the next level. Yep, that's right, it's diesel time! I think Mercedes OM617 should be rude and crude enough to leave a lasting impression on the Concours d'elegance crowd.

  12. I'm torn, I usually love swaps, customs etc and I am no purist, but….some things should not be messed with. Old sports cars are one of those things, leave them be, preserve them, show them, and most of all drive them. The spirit that they were built on is getting obfuscated by lack of imagination, computer aided design (leading to boring smoothed out designs) etc. etc. If you want something like this, start with a kit of some kind, leave the originals alone. If I where to build a 28 – 32 Ford I would start with a Brookfield body, not an original. Do the same with this. I understand the motivation behind this one but really, An auto trans? That shows lack of imagination and laziness. I think the execution of this shows a disrespect for the spirit for which this car was originally built. And that is an insult to sports car lovers everywhere.
    All right, now let me don my asbestos undies.

  13. What happened to the original engine? the real amazing swap would be to see this v12 transplanted in a Geo metro, or a mini.

  14. I dunno. Ferraris of that era are pretty crude in a lot of ways, and the V12 and pretty styling are pretty much their only virtues. Dropping a modern engine in something like an Alvis Td — which has lovely Graber bodywork, but an ancient lump of a six — is one thing, but this is kind of like casting [insert sex symbol of your choice] in a movie and putting a bag over his/her head through most of the running time.

  15. The LT1 is shit. I'm sorry. I'm not a bowtie fanatic but I know a LS series is the better SBC. The LT1 is fine so long as you drive it in Death Valley. Don't let any water near it or it won't start. Optispark FTL.
    And the slushbox is just blasphemy in ANY sporting car.

  16. I've got no problem with an automatic in a Gran Turismo, and a lot of early sports car racers pulled the engines in their second-hand factory rides, threw in an OHV V8 and kept racing. If you want something cool that you actually drive, it's not a bad way to go. I'd love to see it with some Webers.

  17. LT1 and a slushbox is the laziest of the lazy swaps, and speaks of someone completely uninterested in how his car behaves in motion.
    Poor ol’ Ferrari… I’m anything but fan of the brand, but a vintage GT is a vintage GT, and old sheetmetal should be treated with respect.
    Better ad: Ferrari 250GTE seeks Alfa Brera V6 and T-56 tranny for long-term relationship. Enjoys long trips along winding biways. Turn-offs: heavy block castings, Sawz-Alls.

  18. okay I can deal with the engine choice, but it had better be built to be bad.
    What's up with the tranny choice?
    Why go half-ass when you could be super trick and make it something cohesive with the rest of the car in beauty?
    Why not do something odd or huge? No viper blocks sitting around? What about a massive 460? 502? Shit, warp everyone's minds and put some exotic straight six in there.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 64 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop files here