Lamest Classics: It’s Time for Onanism in a Volvo 940

By Alan May 29, 2020

I’m writing this on National Masturbation Day (mildly NSFW link) , which means you’re reading this a day late to use that as an excuse. Not that you need an excuse. The whole point of the “holiday” is to lessen the stigma associated with masturbation, and contribute to the conversation about safer sex and safe methods of sexual expression.

I’d say that this kind of talk is probably not approved by your grandma, but National Masturbation Day started in 1995, which means some 25-year-old activist who was very much into the movement at the time could easily be a grandma today. A grandma. Maybe not your grandma.

It’s also unlikely that said activist drove a grandma car like the Volvo 940. At least not back then.

For Touring Museums, Not a Touring Car

That’s because it wasn’t a young person’s car; It was the durable, dull, boxy machine for the professor, the accountant, the woman of means but of practical taste. It was the big, slow Volvo. It was most certainly not the curb-hopping, BTCC-stomping badass 850 race wagon.

It was, however, among the last rear-wheel-drive Volvos, outlived only by its more powerful 960/V90 sibling. They came standard with a naturally aspirated version of Volvo’s valiant redblock engine, but by 1995, even the available B230FT turbocharged engine could only be paired with a 4-speed automatic.

That means even if you crank up the boost on that motor in an attempt to liberate its connecting rods from the 5-main-bearing crankshaft, you’re still missing an element of the fun.

Priced for Prestige

But even the slowest version, which looks decidedly pedestrian today when listed with sale prices straddling three and four figures, was not cheap in 1995. The base price of a GL sedan was $23,360 – that’s practically 40 grand today.

And though Volvos are known for durability, these were more complex than their even-boxier 200-series predecessors. Meaning you can find examples for sale pushing 300,000 miles. But it took some effort (or a lowering of ones’ standards for “fixed”) to get there.

Safety First, Pedophilia Later

Volvo’s main selling point though, was safety. They’d leveraged their whole image on that, to the point where it was embraced as a prime alternative-advertising example in the 1990 movie Crazy People.

I watched this movie in my high school economics class, which means Mr. Burris is becoming a regular feature in in this series.

The whole conceit of that movie is that Paul Reiser has a career-stress-induced breakdown and ends up in a mental hospital, where he befriends a crazy person who then, through the power of being blunt, helps him craft a series of nontraditional ads – including one about Jaguar buyers buying Jaguars because Jaguar owners get handjobs from women they hardly know – that are enormously successful. Crazy People also contains possibly the only punchline involving pedophilia that I’ve ever seen in a movie.

That took a weird turn.

The point is, Volvos of the ‘90s were still living the “boxy but good” ethos. The fact that even a now-old economy car vastly outperforms this big Swede is irrelevant. You’re not buying a Volvo for its actual safety.

You’re buying it for the safety reputation (in addition to its classic status, which even Volvo grants it by listing both sedan and wagon on its Heritage site). That’s what Grandma bought it for after all. And, once you pick which example you want to buy that’s been listed on Facebook Marketplace on her behalf by her grandson, you can do whatever you want with it.

Even things she wouldn’t approve of.

In every seat.

In every position.

Just… tint the windows first, OK?

By Alan

I'm a giant nerd and lifelong iconoclast who happens to like cars, especially terrible ones. I've built many low-budget race cars, driven in many Lemons races, worked at a Real Deal Print Car Magazine, and gave up that lifestyle in the interest of life balance. I also wear khakis and ride bicycles, though rarely at the same time.

19 thoughts on “Lamest Classics: It’s Time for Onanism in a Volvo 940”
  1. Do you want to start a war with Sweden? Because that’s how you start a war with Sweden.

  2. Scandinavians would say: “Javel, ja”, which is very harsh criticism. Why the picture of a black 850 sedan? That one was Volvo’s first all new car since 1944, in 1990.

    Anyway, 940 Classic Editions and the S/V90 have regularly been sold for 20+k$ in Europe the last 5-8 years. That’s the best of the best of what some people believe to be the last “real” car. Call it a European Panther-sentiment.

    I always thought the 200-series had way more charme and was more entertaining to drive, despite lacking comparatively in every rational way. Probably why Volvo did continue 240 production after the introduction of the 740.

    1. As a friend used to say, before a car can become a classic, “the dogs have to die” ..i.e. the rough examples disappear so you’re just left with a small pool of good cars and a few project examples that haven’t been snapped up and a lot of 940s were snapped up in that unloved period to become everything from welded-diff trampdrift cars to full on Gatebil monsters, so anyone who wants a clean standard one is in for a tough search.

    2. The 900 series marks the end of my interest in Volvo. I still admire Volvo design in a lot of ways, but the move to a FWD platform was a deal-breaker for me. I wouldn’t even consider buying an 850.

      1. It’s funny how I both understand your sentiment and almost agree, yet the 850 was what saved Volvo from being swallowed by Renault – and it marks the beginning of a new, very successful era, commercially. Not for us, but it kept the company going.

        1. I completely agree with you, and expected that you might be the one to reinforce that point. New beginnings don’t come without endings, though. From my perspective, it’s almost as if Volvo was swallowed up anyway.

          As much as I like the appearance of many post-900 Volvos, I don’t care much for the way they drive. The 240 was admittedly slow, but fun to drive all the same. The FWD-platform cars I’ve driven– even when sufficiently powered– aren’t exciting in the slightest, and the steering is numb.

      2. I understand, but I’ve also briefly owned a 5 Pot turbo S80 and while it’ll never have the RWD silliness potential, it was an incredibly pleasing car as something for the non-hooning driving. Just ridiculously effortless and comfortable everywhere. It wasn’t exciting, but that was the entire point, it knew exactly what it was for without the sort of pseudo sportiness you’d find in a German saloon.

        1. I think it’s the steering in the FWD Volvos that bugs me– that’s my big issue with most FWDs. Combining both steering and propulsion duties in one pair of wheels compromises both functions, in my opinion. Volvo ruins the steering even further by giving it absolutely no feedback at all. In my E30, I felt like I could almost “see” the road surface through the steering wheel. In my wife’s XC90, I couldn’t tell you if I was on asphalt, grass, or gravel. The XC90 (now in the hands of my teenaged son) is in my opinion a great vehicle and I still love the look of it, but as driving goes, it’s purely an appliance.

          The “pseudo-sportiness” you refer to in the German sedans isn’t artificial, nor does a RWD have to be hooned around to be fun. I like having a measure of control on both ends of the car, without acceleration muddying the steering or the steering influencing power delivery. I compare it to rock climbing. FWD is like trying to climb using only your hands and arms, instead of using your hands for direction and grip, and your legs for push.

          1. I’m not the biggest fan of FWD either (and lets not forget there are plenty of very entertaining FWD cars too), but it was an everyday sort of car as you say and it really didn’t seem to matter. Devoid of steering feel, but the old RWD volvos were rarely the sharpest driving machines either.

            The average non-M BMW 5 series (or equivalent Audi/Mercedes) is often fitted with an M-Sport pack and other cosmetic allusions of “sportiness” and yeah, you can be entertained if you try hard enough, but it’s still a compromise that deep down is still a sedan for the average non-enthusiast that will become apparent when you really hoon it. Often comfort is compromised, while not being a truly fulfilling enthusiast car either. I liked the Volvo because it just set out to do one thing and do it well, but that’s generally my approach with cars anyway. Stuff that’s a halfway house often leaves me cold.

      3. I understand, but I’ve also briefly owned a 5 Pot turbo S80 and while it’ll never have the RWD silliness potential, it was an incredibly pleasing car as something for the non-hooning driving. Just ridiculously effortless and comfortable everywhere. It wasn’t exciting, but that was the entire point, it knew exactly what it was for without the sort of pseudo sportiness you’d find in a German saloon.

        1. I think it’s the steering in the FWD Volvos that bugs me– that’s my big issue with most FWDs. Combining both steering and propulsion duties in one pair of wheels compromises both functions, in my opinion. Volvo ruins the steering even further by giving it absolutely no feedback at all. In my E30, I felt like I could almost “see” the road surface through the steering wheel. In my wife’s XC90, I couldn’t tell you if I was on asphalt, grass, or gravel. The XC90 (now in the hands of my teenaged son) is in my opinion a great vehicle and I still love the look of it, but as driving goes, it’s purely an appliance.

          The “pseudo-sportiness” you refer to in the German sedans isn’t artificial, nor does a RWD have to be hooned around to be fun. I like having a measure of control on both ends of the car, without acceleration muddying the steering or the steering influencing power delivery. I compare it to rock climbing. FWD is like trying to climb using only your hands and arms, instead of using your hands for direction and grip, and your legs for push.

    1. That is some hilariously obscure comedy right there.

      It’s safe, but kinda not so I won’t add it here but… if you’re bored look up the Poxy Boggards “Ballad of Onan” on Youtube. That particular rabbit hole is the only reason I got your reference.

  3. 720 BHP 940 drift car walkaround and yes I know you can argue any car can be modified to be interesting, but what’s interesting is how much of the original car is retained. Still got its B series engine block, no LS swap here, still has a mostly original body, still has the original rear axle. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_dape21tqtk&t=330s

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 64 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop files here