Hooniverse Asks: What was History’s Most Ill-Proportioned 2+2?

By Robert Emslie Apr 21, 2017


In case you hadn’t heard, Jaguar is planning on offering for sale 10 fully restored to new-car-smell fresh E-Types. When the company first made this known I was a little worried over just which E-Types they’d choose to restore. So far it seems they did the right thing and chose to rejuvenate only two-seater Series 1 cars. Those are quite possibly one of the most beautiful automobiles the world has ever seen, and a far better choice than the star of my nightmare scenario, the 2+2 coupe. Holy cow but that’s a silk purse to sow’s ear transformation. 
As a matter of fact, most two-seater coupes that are extended to include occasional back seats end up looking funky as a result. Consider if you will the Mercedes SL and its more capacious brother the SLC, which one would you date?
Today we’re looking for the most undatable of 2+2s, the cars that were unfortunate recipients of an unsuccessful transformation to car pool duty. Which do you think is the world’s most ungainly 2+2?
Image: MOMENTCar

70 thoughts on “Hooniverse Asks: What was History’s Most Ill-Proportioned 2+2?”
    1. I would say that is possibly the best 2+2 ever made. It almost looks better than the two seater which is a real beauty.

      1. The funniest description I’ve read for this is “if you think this is good looking, you’re probably the sort of person that fancies the Queen”

        1. As usual, everyone forgets the Mondial. To me the Mondial always looked like a poorly executed kit car copy of the GTB. The GT4, GTB/GTS, and Mondial all share a common architecture though.

    1. It’s a really nice car, but it’s the Emily Deschanel of cars, only under appreciated because of a more more popular sister.

    1. It’s strange how GB’s worst styled products have a distinct Soviet look. And I’m an automobile cubist who would like this one if you had described it without a picture.

      1. I was thinking the same thing: it’s like a British designer’s idea of the kind of car that a wealthy communist party apparatchik would have hidden at his dacha

    2. I’ve always thought of Bristols from that period on as the motoring equivalent of those expensive Barbour jackets, functional clothing back in the day, long surpassed by more modern, better, cheaper, stylish alternatives, but continues to trade on an aristocrat image. The fact that the car was an underdeveloped, overpriced, just plain ugly 50s relic (especially compared to earlier cars) is dismissed as us proles just not being cultured enough to get it, even LJK setright was suckered by them. It’s sort of like rolling class trolling.
      Don’t get me wrong, it’d be pretty interesting to drive one and enjoy its quirkyness, but I can’t help think that Tony Crook was a bit PT Barnum in his later years. The “exclusivity” and only selling a handful of cars to the “right” people was just trying to camouflage the lack of investment that even the likes of Aston Martin just about scraped together.

        1. Saw plenty of similar things in Prague, some original Skoda’s but many more fiberglass replicas built on a Hilux chassis or something.

          1. Yeah, exactly. Quite funny sight to behold. I tried to find the manufacturers site again, but my Google-fu let me down. Original comments on the Prague-article were victims to the IntenseDebate/Disqus-apocalypse.

    1. It appears to be a hatchback, never noticed that before, but British cars was never my strong side.

    1. Even the ZX in the lede photo isn’t terrible. The t tops don’t help it though. When I had one I liked to think of it as a slightly more aerodynamic shooting brake.

    2. Imho this one is actually very nice. And I guess it’s cheaper to get? My kind of 2+2 then.

    3. Agree, I’m going to end up over using the Emily Deschanel of cars analogy in this thread I think..

        1. Isn’t it obvious? the more diminutive, better known sister http://zcarworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/7862_rw2_1152.jpg
          In the case of the 308 GT4 mentioned above it’s the Dino, and yet it’s easy to overlook the appeal of the lesser known sister.. I remember when 308GT4s could be picked up for as little as €5000 and were sneered at as the car you bought simply because you were desperate to have a ferrari badge, but couldn’t afford a “real” ferrari. https://youtu.be/SZ9s3P34v9s

          1. Thanks. Instead of thinking popularity and arriving at the logical conclusion my brain derailed at “what’s the kooky version of this” and got stuck in a ditch.

    4. Darker shades helped hide some of the bulk of these, as did replacing the budget-spec wheel covers with decent wheels. Dad had one in Emerald Green with wires that was pretty.

    1. Somehow that T-Bird duo makes me think of a high school football team’s quarterback’s picture at age 17 followed by his picture at age 57.

    2. Hey now… (note the avatar) 😀
      The buying public of the day certainly disagreed, it outsold it handily.
      I’d also note that you found one of the most ungainly looking Squarebirds. A hardtop (convertibles look cleaner), no skirts and the 59’s awkward door trim.

    3. How does the 65 and 67 T-birds fit into this analogy? Facelift and a major session in the gym? I may be alone here, but I actually like these two more than the original car. They’re a better execution at the personal luxury idea that the T-Bird unintentionally started than the T-Bird was an attempt at a sports car. A bit like Jamacians trying to sing R&B but it getting lost in translation and ending up with Ska/Reggae instead.
      http://www.americanoldtimercars.com/kepek/ford-thunderbird-1965-convertible-01.jpg
      http://momentcar.com/images/ford-thunderbird-1967-6.jpg

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 64 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop files here