Encyclopedia Hoonatica: Cars with NACA Ducts

By Tim Odell Aug 20, 2010

Ferrari F40

Believe it or not, developing a scoop that’s effective at scooping air in without creating ridiculous amounts of drag is phenomenally difficult. It’s actually quite easy to design a scoop looking thing that barely scoops at all. You could say it sucks…but the problem is it doesn’t.
Luckily, the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (the predecessor to NASA) figured it out for us back in the 1940s. As the rocket/jet age took off (har, har…), the NACA duct was born from a need to pull air into jet engines without significantly disrupting the flow of passing air. Semi-ironically, NACA ducts can’t really pull in enough air to feed a jet engine, but they work great for lower-speed cooling applications.
While supersonic road going vehicles remain a Syd Meade-grade product of The Retro Future, the needs for air intake, cooling and aerodynamic slickness continue to increase. This was particularly true in the 70s, as cars went from matching artists’ conceptions of what a rocket car should be to meeting engineers’ design requirements for top speed and fuel economy. Hence, a preponderance of NACA ducts in the ’70s and ’80s.
For today’s Encyclopedia Hoonatica, simply pulling up every JC Whitney-ized Civic you can find on Google image search won’t cut it. It’s gotta be the submerged, curvy beauty that is the NACA duct, and it’s gotta be from the factory.

Just to eliminate another bit of low-hanging fruit, here’s an Espada, which The Missus refers to as “her Lambo”, as she has plans to kill me with six Italian carburetors feeding twelve cylinders sport one as a semi-practical mom-mobile some day.
As always, do please refresh the page and read previous comments so as to avoid duplicates. And here’s how to embed images in the comments.
Image Source: Wikipedia

57 thoughts on “Encyclopedia Hoonatica: Cars with NACA Ducts”
    1. Damn – I knew there was a Z with a NACA, but I thought for sure it was a late 80's 300zx, not early 80's 280….missed the search by *that* much…

  1. In chronological order:
    1970 Porsche 917
    <img src="http://i615.photobucket.com/albums/tt237/jskitter/hooniverse/Porsche917.jpg&quot; width="600">
    1974 Lamborghini Countach (hat tip to tonyola)
    <img src="http://i615.photobucket.com/albums/tt237/jskitter/hooniverse/1978_Countach_LP400S.jpg&quot; width="600">
    1987 Ruf CTR "Yellowbird"
    <img src="http://i615.photobucket.com/albums/tt237/jskitter/hooniverse/ruf_ctr-2a.jpg&quot; width="600">
    1990 Mercedes Sauber C11
    <img src="http://i615.photobucket.com/albums/tt237/jskitter/hooniverse/NACADuctMercedesSauber.jpg&quot; width="600">

  2. I was all excited to throw up pictures of a Peugeot 206 GTI and a Lancia Delta Integrale. Although they both have hood venting/intakes, neither of them have NACA ducts.

  3. It's gotta be from the factory? Well, this one should have been, does that count?
    <img src=http://www.revlimiter.net/mods/pix/scoop1.jpg>

    1. Yeah, probably not NACA ducts. But I just wanted to post the photo. Such an incredible car.

    1. Actually the intake is directly behind the left headlamp.
      <img src=http://image.modified.com/f/26977255+w750+st0/modp_0912_05_o+1994_mazda_miata_r_package+engine_bay.jpg>

  4. The Pantera is straight out of the NACA Duct Golden Age, in dire need of better cooling, but ironically devoid of The Blessed Duct.

    1. Whoa…that took me a second to notice.
      …actually on a lot of these I've been like "no….OHWAIT, now I see it!"

    2. Are those wheels on the wrong side of the car or are they designed to cool the brakes in reverse?

      1. As far as I can tell, these would neither force air inward nor aid with extracting air to the outside.
        And they are symetrically opposite across the car.

    1. [img src="www.website.com/image.jpg" width="600"]
      Except with pointy less-than greater-than brackets
      EDIT: Extended website link, and, weirdly, attempting to correct your link in my browser sends me to the wiki page for HTTP protocol.

  5. Yes, yes it is.
    "Name a car with a periscope"
    "Name a car with gullwings and MB power"
    "Name a car from a manufacturer with an inscrutable website"
    "Name a car that non-car-nerds will have never EVER heard of"

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 64 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop files here