Diecast Delights: A 2003 Thunderbird in 1:18 Scale

IMAG2426
This is a model that I’m still slightly angry about and have been since I bought it, second hand, from eBay. Owning as I did already another model by Beanstalk, the superb Ford GT, I was intrigued to see what their other early-Millennial Ford offerings were like. The Thunderbird was one and it was on eBay for a sensible price. I bid, I bought.
When it arrived I realised that I really never liked Ford’s final Thunderbird, so why the hell did I buy it? It stayed in its box and I didn’t look at it again for a few months.
When I finally came to revisit it I found that the previous owner had obviously broken a wheel off and glued it back in place so it no longer turned. It was also dirty and dusty from prior display. I was cross. So here we are now. Well, we might as well 1ook at the bloody thing again now.
I suppose.

IMAG2464
What can be said of the eleventh-gen Thunderbird? Well, I’ll leave that up to you. My take on it was that Ford, on a bit of a J Mays related high were caught up in the retrofuturist buzz a little too heavily. They released one show-car after the next, to wide critical acclaim, so they started looking through their back catalogue to see which of their historic releases they could “do a Beetle on”.
They chose the Thunderbird; specifically the first 1955 generation to reinterpret. J Mays and his buddies got the markers out and before we knew it there was a Thunderbird show car. The public went wild with enthusiasm, Ford green-lit it for series production and the rest is history.
But somehow it didn’t quite hit the spot. It was nice enough, looked good, the porthole windows were cool, but it didn’t really achieve anything. The Re-imagining of the Beetle had been overwhelmingly successful because it appealed for both nostalgic and fashion reasons and was affordable to a large slice of the population. The Thunderbird…. well, there were many generations of that car that nobody really WANTED to remember, the nameplate was only killed off five years earlier and it was released at a price which didn’t suit anywhere near enough people. You had to really want one, and rather fewer people ended up wanting one than Ford had hoped, with sales declining year on year.

IMAG2444
Er, time to bust out the dustbuster. Looks like the 1:18 Jack Russell has been moulting again.

Then there was the disappointment of the car itself. Based partially on the same DEW platform as the Jaguar S-Type and Lincoln LS there was nothing remotely innovative about it, it was all style and not a huge amount of substance. To compound this, when the driver was inside the car and couldn’t see the retro flourishes of the exterior (which J Mays would take great pains to explain weren’t retro, the lying bastard), there was virtually nothing that told him he was driving anything special. It was just another blow-moulded Ford dashboard.
Ford could have used the New Thunderbird to show the world something really special, like they tried to do in the ’60s with the release of every new generation. Personally, I think they should have taken inspiration from the ’66 and gone super-luxury, and done it with confidence. That would have been a great chance to take the brand upmarket, and I reckon it would have worked.
IMAG2451
So, to the model. Well, it’s alright. It’s accurate in shape, the detailing is nice, the grille is perforated and the headlamps look convincing (if you tell yourself that the mounting stubs are lightbulbs). The little Thunderbird tampos are cleanly applied, if a little simplistic and the Coral paintwork is good and not too shiny
IMAG2466
There are a few issues with fit and finish; the bootlid leaves a gap when it closes around the rear lamps and the removable hard-top (which is a nice idea) doesn’t quite mount flat against the rear deck (which kinda ruins the effect).
When the hard-top is off there’s a plastic cover which simulates the look of a folded soft-top and probably looks a bit more convincing than when the hard-top is in place, just because it’s a more accurate fit.
IMAG2446
Under the bonnet lurks a reasonably detailed 4.0 AJ35 V8, which is probably no more interesting to look at in the 1:1 than it is here, so we’ll lay off a little bit. It’s an engine, it’s there. Pass.
What else?
IMAG2433
Oh yeah, the interior. Well, it’s crappy and plastic. Which means that the crappy plastic here hits the nail pretty much on the head. Credit to Beanstalk, though, it’s very accurately modelled. If Ford DARED produce an interior like this on a “Statement” car like the the Thunderbird today, it would be met with ridicule, contempt and no little mirth. Mind you, I’m sure they wouldn’t fit the instrument cluster (represented here as a sticker) in a position 20 degrees off the horizontal.
So that’s it then. A less than stellar model of a slightly ill-concieved car.
A car which, I’ll be honest, I’d rather like to own. Yep, I guess you were expecting me to say that.
(All images copyright Chris Haining / Hooniverse 2015. Doesn’t photograph terribly well, does it?)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 64 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop files here

  1. stigshift Avatar
    stigshift

    I finally got to drive one of those a while back. It would make a nice accompaniment to my NA Miata. And it would be far better suited to long distance trips…

  2. Maymar Avatar
    Maymar

    On one hand, the Thunderbird’s interior is pretty much directly taken from the Lincoln LS, just with the more colourful (and pleated) seats, and the gauges. But, the LS’s interior isn’t that highly acclaimed, so, eh? Grand scheme of things, it’s not bad for a Ford (way better than the contemporary New Edge Mustang’s interior).
    And, I’ve got the Maisto Thunderbird sitting around somewhere. The trunk doesn’t really line up properly, just like yours. But, I found out the hard way, my hardtop isn’t supposed to come off (doesn’t matter, it’s off now).

    1. Rover 1 Avatar
      Rover 1

      I got two Maistos so that I could have one roof up, one down. And they were cheap.
      I like the pale yellow of the Maisto version. The colour on yours shows that it might be the 007 model as driven by Halle Berry , or more realistically one of the 700 replica special editions in the distinctive Coral pink/orange.
      http://www.jamesbondlifestyle.com/product/2003-ford-thunderbird-limited-edition-007
      http://www.jamesbondlifestyle.com/sites/default/files/styles/fancybox_popup/public/images/product/au007-ford-thunderbird-007-color.jpg?itok=CLsMNd_y

      1. Rust-MyEnemy Avatar

        Yep, this is the Bond edition. The box is emblazoned with Die Another Day, which in my opinion ranks among the worst Bond films of all time.

        1. Rover 1 Avatar
          Rover 1

          But, but… invisibility and the return of Aston Martin…?
          And Halle Berry in a bikini?

          1. Rust-MyEnemy Avatar

            Yes……invisibility.

        2. Vairship Avatar
          Vairship

          Nah, Casino Royale is in a league of it’s own when it comes to bad Bond movies: Bond plays Celebrity Poker… for two-and-a-half-hours!

  3. smalleyxb122 Avatar
    smalleyxb122

    My AutoArt XJS arrived from Germany on Saturday (well it arrived the Tuesday prior, but I had to wait until the weekend to get to the post office to sign for it). I’m quite pleased with it, so I don’t hate you for making me want it.
    I don’t want this one. Even if you had given it a stellar review, I wouldn’t want one. That is unless I were to find a too-good-to-pass-up deal on a 1:1. I don’t hate the Thunderbird, and if a cheap enough one presented itself, I could see myself owning one, and if I owned one, I would need to get a diecast one.
    Several cars that I have owned will likely never be made into a diecast (Who is going to make a model of a rental-spec 1998 Buick Skylark?), but I’m doing my best to own diecasts of cars that I own or have owned. That’s part of why I couldn’t pass up the deal on the Jaguar.

    1. Rust-MyEnemy Avatar

      AutoArt really should do a ’98 Skylark. Think of all the customer they’re missing out.

      1. smalleyxb122 Avatar
        smalleyxb122

        I know, right?
        To be fair, I have a 1:43 of an early ’90s Maxima, so anything is possible.
        Other cars I’ve owned are a bit more confusing as to why they aren’t available in diecast.
        Chevy made a bajillion first-gen S10s, and they are well loved liked, yet there is no first-gen S10 available, save poorly rendered 1:64 scale. I have owned 2 first-gen S10s – a 2wd extended cab, and a 4wd standard cab.
        Likewise, Chevy made oodles of GMT400 pickups. I can find GMT800s all day, but my K1500 is only available in a 1:24 plastic dealer promo (and even that is actually a C1500).
        The most frustrating, though, is the ’63 Corvette I owned. No one makes a diecast ’63 convertible. I can find countless ’63 split-windows, and ’65 or ’67 convertibles are likewise plentiful, but no one makes a ’63 convertible. I do have an unbuilt AMT plastic model of one, but as far as I know, that is the only scale model of a ’63 Corvette convertible that exists.

        1. Rust-MyEnemy Avatar

          Watch this space for something else I never expected to find in 1:18.

          1. Vairship Avatar
            Vairship

            THIS space, or ^THAT space? 😉

          2. Rust-MyEnemy Avatar

            Ah! ^THAT one. I await two knocks on the door.