Craigslist Crapshoot

By Robert Emslie Jan 23, 2013

The World’s Worst Car Is For Sale On CraigslistWelcome to Craigslist Crapshoot, our weekly dive into the deep end of the pool filled with the automotive world’s most horrible road warriors – that you could potentially buy. This week, I’m sending you on a hunt for a specific sort of Craigslist Crap – that being convertibles. After all, it is the depth of winter.

What I want you to find are the worst convertibles out there that one might buy and drive – remember the rules, they have to be running and licensable  for the road. Don’t feel constrained by factory drop tops, backyard Sawzall efforts work here too, and are probably the worst, er best. Also, check out last week’s biggest crap pile after the jump. 

Annnnnnd, last week you all came up with a slew of truly terrible cars and trucks that someone somewhere thought someone else might actually trade for good money. It was a true carpet bombing of crap. But there can be only one king of crap, and from last week’s offerings, 5keptic wears that crown. Here’s why-

Nice 4WD GMC - $7999 (Capital Region)

Source: [Albany Craigslist]

213 thoughts on “Craigslist Crapshoot”
  1. This is partially about the ad more than the car itself – which is bad, but I have confidence will be surpassed. Anyway, for most of the ad, the seller is going on about the car's winter prowess. It has several block heaters, which you don't need because it starts in -40, and it's so amazing in winter. Then here's the kicker: "Missing rear window."
    <img src="http://i.ebayimg.com/00/s/NzUwWDEwMDA=/$(KGrHqZ,!roFDjw55i)HBQ+gwnVFn!~~48_20.JPG" width="500">
    That's kind of important in a winter beater.
    Here

    1. The missing rear window actually helps in the winter. Look when you have the heater going the open rear window pulls the cold air out of the car and lets only the heated air stay in there.

    2. "Several block heaters"? So every freeze plug has been replaced by a block heater? Gee, I think that means the engine has been apart.

      1. What I like about that tarp is how it obviously didn't work. Check out how well its sticking to the car. So unless its clear and has glue on it. There was water under it.

    1. I am unilaterally awarding Pwned88 second place becausegoddamnit this is hilarious.
      "*for people asking why it's wisconsin plated, my step brother in law drove it here 17 years ago and it was basically dead when he got here. i gave him 16$(back then it covered a greyhound ticket) and said i'd work on it. he died while attempting to repair a bbq and simultaneously smoking a cig and since then the cars been left with me. i did my best to revive it, but my stepsister wants the car gone because its the last thing that reminds her of his determination.*"
      I don't know anything about beer, so here's something else horrible and awesome:
      [youtube bWbYwOSPjH8 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bWbYwOSPjH8 youtube]

    1. The only part of it that's running is the person looking at it. Not only is the exterior awful check out the seat covers as well.

      1. The graphics are straight out of the 80's too. Doesn't it look like the guy used a ground effects kit on the sides of the truck, but not on the front and rear?

      2. Man, I thought I was the only one! Having seen many of these in person (ghettotown, NM), I can say that the G's take their shit seriously. Well, did, anyway. Before Fast and Furious.

        1. Part of me actually kinda misses the lowrider age. I have a soft spot for the sheer absurdity and effort that went into it. Living in the era of the slammed makes it kinda disappointing to miss out on the airborne wire wheels, wild glitter paint, and polished and gold plated pumps and air lines…

          1. Lowrider shows were the best. There were unifying themes and ideas, but everyone had their own take on it. I had no idea of the technical details of what I was looking at, but they all seemed like giant Tonka toys to me. I also remember flipping through the latest Lowrider magazine, fantasizing about triple gold wire wheels.
            Besides, the thong-clad women were the most I'd ever seen of the female form at the time. The kids these days, with their internet, don't know how easy they have it…

      1. Or if its just his fingers near the edges of the lens. I love camera phone pictures. Who needs DSLR's?

          1. "Should we get the snow off the car before we put it on Craigslist?"
            "Heck no it will hide the scratches this way"
            "Ok now when you take the picture stand on the only shoveled part under the flood light and use your iPhone 3GS"

          2. I thought the cavemen flying harriers was pretty funny. I mean, it's no Double Team but I had a couple laughs.

          3. I spent that whole scene saying "Wait, but this is 997 years after the last Harrier was built…"
            Really couldn't suspend my disbelief for that one.

          4. A 1,000 year old and very complicated plane is not only completely operational, but totally easy to fly for a big group of novices who have never seen a plane before.
            It's still amazing that the movie was released in theaters and everything.

    1. Two things. First its inspected until Feb 2013. So enjoy your two weeks with it. Second its wired for more beat in the truck. Do many people grow beats in their trunk? I guess they match the paint color.

    1. It needs an airbrushed portrait of its rear end on its tailgate, and then that tailgate needs an airbrushed portrait…so on and so forth.

    2. The meta piece is what makes this work. The fact that the snow becomes part of the artwork really ads to its value.

      1. Is her name Deinver?
        and did they try to cover something else up behind the girl? it kinda looks like there are wheels of something behind her, but whatever it was how could it have been worse than this?
        once you see it – you can't un-see it

    1. So what are the other four cars he owns? Oh and he needs to go much lower if he wants a LeMons team to turn it into a race car.

    1. But it's only got four doors – there's a white one for sale (for years) near me, that has six doors.

    1. They definatly tried to ruin a burban…. but it is repairable. it was somwhere on the inter webs a few months back. I would buy it and put it back to right and make back some of the cost selling the bed and trailer axels off. or cut it off and put a tongue on it add a frame and hydraulic cylinder and make it a dump trailer.

    1. It seems pretty tastefully done (for a Craigslist Crapshoot contender). The price tag makes me shake my head though…

  2. I post to share, because I think I'm smitten with this wooden Edsel. And it's around where I used to live, HOW DIDN'T I SEE THIS IN PERSON?
    <img src="http://i.ebayimg.com/00/s/NzUwWDEwMDA=/$T2eC16NHJHwE9n8ig+PuBQQ9fKZnMg~~48_20.JPG&quot; width="500">
    <img src="http://i.ebayimg.com/00/s/NzUwWDEwMDA=/$(KGrHqJHJCIF!c-n(EEdBQQ9gDWTFg~~48_20.JPG&quot; width="500">
    <img src="http://i.ebayimg.com/00/s/NzUwWDEwMDA=/$T2eC16VHJHQE9nzEyliUBQQ9hvUiz!~~48_20.JPG&quot; width="500">
    Get some wood

    1. That's amazing! Wow… I am just awe struck by this, and I'd love to see that in person, if only to see if it's well executed.

    1. I was gonna say that's a Plymouth in any case, but given the location this may be a Canadian built car; they were so fond of slapping the Dodge name on cars that were mostly Plymouth.

    2. Looks like they got both the year and make wrong. Its a 1964 Plymouth Valiant convertible. Definitely a US model – the Canadian model was based on a Dodge Dart shell, so had a longer wheelbase and the Dodge rear (different tail lights).
      At that price, assuming the top frame is intact and the shell is not too far gone, it might even be worth restoring. It looks like all the chrome is there and in good condition. At worst, it would make a really good parts donor. It's a pity it's not a '65 – I'd be really interested in a few of the parts if it was.

    1. Wait that's a runner? I had a hard time believing that when its being held in the box by that tow rope.

    1. Our piano tuner father son pair keep buying and driving used Sebring convertibles. It's so impractical, especially in winter, with the back and trunk just overflowing with tools and piano parts, that it makes me happy every time I pay them.

    2. Yes it is low grade crap. But a rust free, running and driving convertible for under 5 grand. Nice Price

    3. My grandparents own one of those.
      I drove it once.
      The dashboard is fake faux carbon fiber. It wants to be fake. Seriously. And the instrument panel is three shades of grey, white, yellow, and red.
      It looks like a fucking McDonald's.
      Still a nicer car than its successor.

  3. Oops, I missed that it was supposed to be a convertible. In that case, I'm resubmitting this thing, since it's still available.
    <img src="http://images.craigslist.org/3G23Ib3o85L15E15W3ccu642508335d7b1305.jpg&quot; width="350">
    <img src="http://images.craigslist.org/3k13Jc3N35N45X15Jfccued6654185bb51d98.jpg&quot; width="350">
    <a href="http://sfbay.craigslist.org/eby/cto/3510879964.html” target=”_blank”>http://sfbay.craigslist.org/eby/cto/3510879964.html

      1. Especially when trying to hide the car's defects.
        …which would be the entire car in this case…

  4. Not sure if you can tell in the picture, because, well, you can barely see anything, but this is a 1977 Blazer (no, wait, it's actually a Jimmy, but he doesn't mention that until later in the ad) that has been converted to a 73 Blazer (Jimmy). Professionally, too, but he doesn't say what the guy's profession was…
    <img src="http://images.craigslist.org/3I93N33Hf5L25Gd5J3d1kfe21c4e3d4a4148a.jpg"&gt;
    And a closeup:
    <img src="http://images.craigslist.org/3G13N93l15I15Le5Fed1k9610557723351ba3.jpg"&gt;
    But the best part is this line: "IT IS READY FOR PAINT,AND NEEDS VERY LITTLE ASSEMBLY,BUT IF YOU KNOW ANYTHING YOU YOU KNOW THE STEEL IS WORTH WHAT I AM ASKING,"
    No sir, I know Blazers, and a chopped up half finished 77 that needs paint is not worth $5,000.

    1. Maybe he added an extra zero? Does it come with a '73 roof? That's the big difference, early K-5s had removable roofs that came to the windshield, the later ones only came to the cab/doors.

      1. I didn't see a roof pictured anywhere, but it was kind of implied…? The rail over the windshield looks like it was made to accept a top.
        I get the desire for the full vert option on a newer body, but that's why you buy a 74 or 75. New body style, no roof over the front seats when the top comes off.

    1. Here is what I don't like about the new Hot Wheels. The wheels always look funny. Well then you see something like this and realize how accurate those models really are.

          1. Most people aren't aware that the good looking Spitfire has its basis in an ugly looking vehicle. It's like the relationship between the Falcon and Mustang.

      1. That's better. Not a fan of that shade of pink, though. I don't have anything particularly against pink, but this shade just doesn't look right on this car.

  5. Seems all I can find today are K5s…
    These wheels are cringe worthy:
    <img src="http://images.craigslist.org/3M33pb3H55I35F15J3d1h987caa5c29ae1efe.jpg"&gt;
    And who doesn't need three woofers with seperate tweeters in each door?
    <img src="http://images.craigslist.org/3kd3K13l95L65Ge5Hdd1hd36f7ae2bb071d51.jpg"&gt;
    Though to be honest, if the body is decent, and the engine, too, then for $3500 it's not a real bad buy. Sell the wheels and put some stock rims and BFG All Terrains on, and you'll net a few bucks, and sell all the speakers, get a set of door panels from LMC, come out a few bucks ahead there, too, and you've got a decent 88 Blazer for $3,000.
    Aw crap, now I'm talking myself into this. I already have one 88 Blazer, no need for two, right?
    <a href="http://stlouis.craigslist.org/cto/3552374277.html” target=”_blank”>http://stlouis.craigslist.org/cto/3552374277.html

    1. Seems like a decent truck and I would be interested if it was original. Im a huge k-5 fan but the new panels if not done really really well would start rotting as soon as it hit this province. These did not stand up well to road salt and usually needed new inner and outer quarters and inner and outer rockers in ten or less years if not well undercoated when new and every year afterwards.

  6. This man is a liar! It will NEVER be a reliable daily driver. I've tried. I pray every morning before I turn the key that it will start. Sometimes, my prayer goes unanswered.
    But I want his interior for my '80 Rabbit Convertible. My seats are shit and my dash is cracked to hell and back. Oddly, my rear bumper is folded in the same way, but not as far, and with none of the accompanying body damage. That must just be how they fold when they're hit.
    <img src="http://images.craigslist.org/3E43L73I95Ge5F45X0d17badfc401cbed1d2a.jpg"&gt;
    <a href="http://kansascity.craigslist.org/cto/3529321476.html” target=”_blank”>http://kansascity.craigslist.org/cto/3529321476.html

    1. Well doesn't it matter if its a Pennsylvanian or German Rabbit? The German ones were reliable where the PA ones weren't?

      1. All 'verts were built in Germany by Karmann, even after the rest of the production moved to PA. So, if it's true that German-built should be more reliable, my car defies that!
        See the little badge behind my front wheel arch? That's the Karmann badge. The white one for sale looks to have it, too. The convertible shared only the front clip with the rest of the lineup, and the unibody was so substantially different that when I have ordered chassis parts, I have to specify that I am ordering for a convertible.
        Unfortunately, I'd probably have less trouble with the thing if it were carbureted instead of the finicky Bosch K-jetronic mechanical fuel injection, but that's just part of its character, right?

    1. From this guy's own admission, he discovered he had an oil leak, and instead of fixing that leak, he decided to spend his time buying TVs to cram into every crevice. That's priorities.

      1. I was going to say, from the way it's riding, it looks like he put all the TVs in the trunk.
        (Yes, I know, that's where the sub is)

      1. Especially the Blach and Purple Interior. The descriptor "Blach" certainly captures the interior. I see a bright future for this guy at Mansory. Very bright. As in: multiple, clashing neon tints in the same interior design bright.

      2. Thanks for the fix- I figured it out and deleted the comment, but you were apparently too quick for me.
        I want to know what the guy's other "showcar" is.

  7. No more reaching up to the roof to hold down your Craigslist-bargain used mattress!
    <img src="http://images.craigslist.org/3K53N63H15Ge5E25Jed13ea035aee45d412dc.jpg"&gt;
    $1,195 1994 Cutlass Supreme Convertible
    * Runs and Drives Great
    * Hauls Queen Beds Like A Champ
    * Steering Pump Makes Whining Sound
    * Windshield Is Cracked
    * Convertible Top Works, Not In The Best Condition Though
    * Leaks Oil
    * Interior Dash Lights Work Sometimes
    * Drivers Side Door Does Not Open
    * Trunk Gets Water In It When It Rains <<yeah, that's not a problem around Seattle.
    http://seattle.craigslist.org/see/cto/3518713196….
    I hope all of their other listings also include the keyword "furnitureding".

    1. This guy has missed a marketing opportunity:
      "Comes complete with queen Serta Sleepmaster to exercise all the tail you'll grab with this ride!"

    1. Well, you can't deny that that is a fine converTABLE…
      It might not ever move under its own power, but tables don't need to do that.

  8. Photograph roulette? Or is Keith taking the aphorism about pictures & their worth in words literally, and attempting to substitute readability with visual Tourette's?
    CHEVY CAMARO 1999 – $6500 (KENT)
    <img src="http://images.craigslist.org/3M73Ic3H45I85M95Jfd1m2c470c092e691159.jpg"&gt;
    <img src="http://images.craigslist.org/3Ia3N73Hb5N55E75K5d1m087f594ea7c31c4d.jpg"&gt;
    <img src="http://images.craigslist.org/3n33E33Jf5Gc5E85H5d1mb1b5923adbe71487.jpg"&gt;
    <img src="http://images.craigslist.org/3Fc3M33Je5I15E25M7d1m5b1d4284865e13fb.jpg"&gt;
    <a href="http://seattle.craigslist.org/see/cto/3565247136.html” target=”_blank”>http://seattle.craigslist.org/see/cto/3565247136.html

  9. I would like to dust some red paint on the Pontiac/Truck mobile used in the header of this post.
    These things always look better with fresh paint.

  10. Rebel Machine for $1,000? That's a great deal in just about any condition!
    <img src="http://images.copart.com/website/data/pix/20121116/28020322_1X.JPG&quot; width=500>
    <img src="http://images.copart.com/website/data/pix/20121116/28020322_3X.JPG&quot; width=500>
    Like I said, just about any. Maybe not so much in this condition.
    <a href="http://www.copart.com/c2/individualLot.html?lotId=28020322&searchType=onSaleNow” target=”_blank”>http://www.copart.com/c2/individualLot.html?lotId=28020322&searchType=onSaleNow

  11. Crappy convertibles? Norwegian and Swedish entries:
    The electric car craze is definitely nothing that lives on taste… 2007 Incalcu two seater, for as little as happy 8000$.
    <img src="http://finncdn.no/mmo/2013/1/vertical-3/04/9/391/165/39_1160890841.jpg"&gt;
    This total crapshoot BMW doesn't drive yet/anymore, but it is so crazy stupid – once found, I had to share.
    <img src="http://finncdn.no/mmo/2012/12/vertical-3/14/5/357/728/15_1933789906_xl.jpg"&gt;
    Volvo Amazon "custom cab. If you puke on it, it won't show:
    <img src="http://213.132.112.105/images_full/27/2708354215.jpg"&gt;
    After all this crap I'd like to wrap it up with something cool again, as so many of you have done before me here. This Volvo TGB1111 in "tank killer" equipment is actually registered as a convertible and it is in true military style hardly used. Nice toy!
    <img src="http://213.132.112.104/images_full/27/2734319049.jpg"&gt;

  12. Okay, this is just a bit too tempting. Though: "Car needs work. Car does work but has motor leak. It has been working on it but decide to sell it and just try to make my money back."
    1990 Mazda rx 7 convertible – $1000
    <img src="http://images.craigslist.org/3Gc3M23J95N65E55Fbd1ie790db38fb431ee4.jpg"&gt;
    <a href="http://sanantonio.craigslist.org/cto/3555759906.html” target=”_blank”>http://sanantonio.craigslist.org/cto/3555759906.html

    1. 1) Purchase
      2) Remove rotary, because purity is overrated.
      3) Install LS1+6speed, because that's the only right answer to the question "what engine should I install in this RWD car?"
      4) ???????
      5) Profit — enjoy your excellent weekend car

    2. Two immediate thoughts:
      If it does not get it fixed, it gets the hose again.
      Or.
      It must keep working on it! It cannot sell the Precious!
      (EDIT: second one is supposed to be Gollum, I wasn't thinking about the dog's name in Silence of the Lambs… Anyway, with those two images, who still wants to go look at it?)

  13. Okay, this lot is seriously kinda tempting. A '67 Impala two-door hardtop and a '65 Impala four-door hardtop parts car (Personally, I'd flip the '67 and keep the '65.) for $1400. Or $1800. Either way, if you look at it as buying by the pound or foot, he's practically giving 'em away!
    <img src="http://images.craigslist.org/3Ee3ne3G85Nc5G45Hed1m4dca06ca8e8a1626.jpg"&gt;
    <img src="http://images.craigslist.org/3Ea3F73Hb5N15G45M6d1m674fd50b9f16161e.jpg"&gt;
    http://losangeles.craigslist.org/lac/cto/35643397

  14. "Celbrity Owned Porsche 911 996 Cabriolet Convertable"
    <img src="http://images.craigslist.org/3K83Ic3N25G35Kc5Fdccv59555115ba2b1b6b.jpg"/&gt;
    "Voted Best Looking 996 at the 2005 24 hours of Daytona"
    "Full Custom Aero Kit Ground Effects from Tech Art created for only TWO Porsches on Earth we are told. A King from Hawaii and David Wesley."
    <a href="http://newhaven.craigslist.org/cto/3513472699.html” target=”_blank”>http://newhaven.craigslist.org/cto/3513472699.html

    1. Wow. Just wow. Those headlights really make the Determined Frog styling pop. The aero kit isn't helping either.

  15. I've had a post with four offerings somewhere here that disappeared again. Could someone almighty unspam it, please?

    1. Assuming it wasn't manually flagged, I have to wonder whether there's some sort of automatic filter that is less tolerant of posts from people without IntenseDebate accounts. Posts with links to craigslist ads and so forth would seem to be a natural target. If so, that could be awkward for this series.

      1. I think it's an autoflag if you've got too many links and no ID account – he says he's got four.
        I can understand why they do it, but it would be super annoying for people with no accounts.

        1. <s>Would</s>…is! I got myself an intensedebate-account relatively fast after I discovered this cool blog and crowd. But it turned out to be intenselyannoying, wasn't just log-in-and-forgot-about-it, so I don' t bother. Maybe I should.
          Come to think about it, four offerings makes eight URLs (link + photo for each). Like I'm trying to sell Viagra to Jesus making 8000$ dollar a month sitting on the lap of a Nigerian prince and so forth.

          1. Yours won't stay logged in? I haven't had a problem with that on my home computer or my phone…

          2. Apologies, as I know Intensedebate is kind of a pain in the ass…seemingly for specific people. Looking at the spam queue, it seems to dislike you. I can say that it seems they've made a number of invisible improvements, as it seems to be broken less now than a year ago.
            I whitelisted this username via wordpress.com, but it doesn't exist in Intensedebate.
            If you drop me an email at ma*********@ho********.info with your IntenseDebate username, I can be sure to add that, so no more spam issues.

          3. Thanks for fixing the post above and your offer for help! I'll try to find the Id. info from a PC later. 🙂

          4. Ok, now I remember. I tried to register at Intensedebate, ended up with WordPress. When I log in here after pressing "reply", I get redirected to intensedebate.com, where I have to log in once more, and than I end up in my intensedebate.com-settings. Not on this page, where I intend to comment – so I have to go back to the Hooniverse all by myself. Can't change my "Gravatar" – "close this window if it doesn't close by itself" – and everything feels wrong. Who made this? Monkeys?
            That's why I didn't bother to log in. 🙂 But I will remember it when I intend to post lots of URLs.
            Edit: Sorry for a lot of boring technical stuff, but with Opera Mini on Android I can't log in to WordPress/Intensedebate at all.

          5. You apparently never got to enjoy the Ganja comment system over on [Redacted]. IntenseDebate is a breath of £∞☠‰☢©☭ fresh air for some of us…
            (Not that your gripes are without merit, software bugs are software bugs, and I tend to be pretty intolerant of them much of the time.)

      2. My fat finger on a small screen gave you a red hand, while I aimed for the green hand. Sorry! Bad tech day.

  16. Minor tech complaint here for the Hoons-in-Chief: I can understand collapsing all the replies when a post accumulates 100 comments, but it really sucks when I open the replies to a comment more than halfway or so down the list, and the page automatically scrolls way back up above where I want to be. Is there a reasonable workaround to this? How about a button to open all replies at once? That would solve for the previous complaint. Aside from this, I'm quite pleased with the value for my dollar that I see here daily!

    1. I've asked the folks at IntenseDebate comments (IDC) about this, because I share your sentiments exactly.
      …I have no good news to tell you. As best I can tell, they're not really doing any real changes/upgrades to IDC. It seems a little less buggy than, say 18 months ago, but I asked them for the features you're talking about back in 2010. They said "yeah…that's a good idea…thanks for the input". 3+ years into things, I'm reluctant to nuke this commenting system in favor of what might be a better option (e.g.: Disqus).
      Though, I don't have that funky scrolling thing you're talking about (I'm using Chrome if that helps).

      1. Bummer, although I can certainly understand not wanting to go through installing a new commenting system.
        Chrome is my primary browser.
        Just dusted off Firefox & tried it there – hey, no weird up-scrolling… guess I'll have to visit the 'verse via FF.
        ETA: Apparently the unwanted-scrolling thing was my own fault – the result of the Chrome extension "DoNotTrackMe".
        Is there a place where the little people can pester IDC about adding functionality like an "expand all comments" button? I imagine we could muster a few hundred complaints/requests regarding that, at the very least.

      2. As an admittedly less than ideal alternative, is it possible to raise the threshold at which the comments become collapsed? I see the value in collapsing them at some point but in most cases I'd rather scroll through a longer list than deal with the current method of selective expansion.

        1. Good thought.The options are 50 or 100.:(I used to say IDC is like an Alfa Romeo b/c it's beautiful and awesome…when it's working. It got a lot less buggy over time, so now it's more like an Apple product: beautiful and easy to use…as long as you want to use it exactly like they intend. “Can I change this in some minor logical extension of what you already do?””Nope.”

  17. This formerly-cranberry Camaro isn't all that bad…
    …and this digital-dash '88 LeBaron that 'grandpa can't drive no more' has its charm…
    …so it comes to a draw between:
    <img src="http://images.craigslist.org/3E23G43Hb5E35H85Mccch087ceb17eaa91f4d.jpg"&gt;
    This horrifyingly riced Metro
    <img src="http://images.craigslist.org/3M13Ia3l05N95Ie5M7d114a9ee48bb9b81a2f.jpg"&gt;
    …and this… hey, wait a second.
    <img src="http://images.craigslist.org/3Id3Nf3Hd5G55T25Had112aad261c06ae150b.jpg"&gt;
    …Well, that's remarkable. At any rate, this other '88 LeBaron Turbo is now sold. Sorry, folks. Guess it's the Metro.
    No, no, wait, there's more, because here's an upside-down '89 LeBaron Turbo. Where in Hell did all of these things come from, all of a sudden? Seriously.
    Still, that friggin' spoiler on that friggin' Metro. That's a hoot.

  18. This eclipse is awesome brah! Love the body work.
    Eclipse, CuStOm!!! PRICE REDUCED – $2800. This is my last ditch effort to sell the car if it doesn't sell i will put it in storage and re list it again for 5k come summer time.
    <img src=http://images.craigslist.org/3Ke3F73N95Kf5M45J3d1d8d6c3380798e1714.jpg">
    <img src=http://images.craigslist.org/3Ib3J33H65N45H65J7d1ea47b479501ce1895.jpg">

  19. Since we're doing converts, I'm reposting these:
    1927 "Model T":
    <img src="http://images.craigslist.org/3G73F73Mc5Le5E55M7cc172e7e16248df18a7.jpg"&gt;
    Ok, so it's a '99 Toyota chassis (reliable!) and '82 S10 drivetrain (not so much).
    http://columbus.craigslist.org/cto/3449013879.htm
    AWESOME RAT ROD!!!!!
    <img src="http://images.craigslist.org/3n93M93Hf5Le5Kb5M8d1gf196e7302a3117fa.jpg"&gt;
    This one's all S10, baby. Well, what's left of it.
    <a href="http://columbus.craigslist.org/cto/3550012817.html” target=”_blank”>http://columbus.craigslist.org/cto/3550012817.html

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 64 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop files here