Craigslist Crapshoot

By Robert Emslie Apr 19, 2017


Welcome to Craigslist Crapshoot, our weekly search for the most bizarre, awesome, and/or terrible vehicles that the online classifieds has to offer.
Last week we went looking for old examples of yet another of the SUV/Crossover dominion’s victims, the Large 2-door Coupe, and we set an arbitrary limit of $5,000 for the spend. We’ll see if size really does matter in a minute. But first, this week’s quest

This past Sunday was Easter, the religious holiday which celebrates the resurrection of Jesus. That got me thinking, and so this week what we want to find is the worst examples of makes and models that have gone away and then been revived. This time, money’s no object. 
 
 As always, we want your finds to go down in infamy and not in the site’s spam filter. Since we’ve changed commenting systems, you may need to update your commenter account. Make sure you have a Disqus account – they’re free and easy to get – and then comment away.

Got that? Good, now let’s get all coupe’d up!
Quite remarkably the votes on last week’s results followed almost in accordance to their recipients’ size. Let’s start off with crank_case giving us one of history’s weirdest coupes ever, and one that was big for Europe, a 2003 Renault Avantime, because it brings the funk. From there we go to the slew of offerings given to us by InLiner, which included a tasty Olds Trofeo (they just aren’t around anymore) and a big Benz 420 SEC, which surprisingly are.
I_Borgward found us a green Connie with questionable hubcaps (ad flagged for removal), while ptschett brought us an example of its later-built brother. Alff went the Jaaag route, while Batshitbox offered us up an F85 Cutlass that, well who wouldn’t want one of those amazing cars?
Harry Callahan‘s contribution was a 1977 Lincoln Continental Coupe (see, they’re getting bigger), which probably requires some sort of extra fee to park owing to its 233-inch length. Our winner, with the most votes is only 2-inches shorter, a 1978 Chrysler New Yorker Coupe, and that was uncovered by GTXcellent, who takes home the kudos.
Congrats to GTXcellent, and thank you all for your coupe contributions. Now, let’s raise some undeserving dead.

48 thoughts on “Craigslist Crapshoot”
    1. Back in the mid-oughts, GM actually said with a straight face that they didn’t need to bring back the Camaro because they had the coupe market all covered with this abomination. That C-pillar was inspired by a beached whale carcass.

    2. I agree. The fifth generation was at best inoffensively handsome, but this thing was a train smash. Whoever did the styling also screwed up the Impala.

    1. My first thought as well. The idea had merit, but the melted bar of design just didn’t cut it. If it had been a better car otherwise instead of the heavy pig it wound up being, it might have been okay, but the little 3.9L V8 was just insufficient.

    1. Back their their Dae they would woo their buyers by the dozens to their dealerships. Thanks to their fuel economy and cheap costs.

      1. Holy smokes, that should be a new Ask: What’s the low point of any manufacturer’s self-esteem? Stellar contender here.

    1. I believe it was C&D who cleverly added, “…but only Avis would buy.” to “the car you knew America could build”. It’s pretty shocking how tone deaf GM was back then.

    2. The salesgal at the Chevy shop made a hard case that the ignition was in a better place.
      That was her selling point.

  1. The 1982 Corvette. Curvaceously sexy, neutered drivetrain aside.
    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/ebd48cc45214ec32a19f283382bab89c62527c016af4c8dfbe84cafc38e7d1e2.jpg
    The 1984 Corvette. Designed by a robot who was fed all the wrong data about what a Corvette should be. Still packing a neutered drivetrain.
    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/9a9bee73a7f1a33b548fa5fc5c27ae0efd29d1cbe1b368fcb7092ecb00e9f3af.jpg
    There was no 1983 Corvette, so if Jesus claimed resurrection after just 3 days stiff, one can definitely say that the Corvette underwent death and resurrection with a full model year missing!

    1. There is a large of me that wonders if these aren’t great first cars thanks to price. I’m guessing they are hell to insure since they are two seat convertibles though.

    1. Shameful confession time – I drove one of these (in Trailhawk spec) a few weeks ago, and I kind of like it. Viewed as a followup to the XJ, it’s jarring, but as a smaller sibling to the WK2 Grand Cherokee (no one seems to object to how it lives up to the ZJ’s legacy), it’s not bad.

      1. I’m kind of with you. The shamefulness of it is probably not fully deserved, but that bad taste that is/was the Compass/Patriot is still in my mouth, and the base models look like a chubby little CUV. The Trailhawk versions look like the vehicle ought to, which brings me to another auto styling rant of mine, when a model is styled to look decent only with upgraded wheels and altered ride height, I find the base models particularly offensive. The 2005-ish Chevy pickups with the Avalanche front ends were the worst offenders. In full Z71 trim they were just ok, but a 2wd version with skinny tires looked very disproportionate.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 64 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop files here