2019 Mustang GT 10-Speed Automatic: An Automatic No?

[Say hello to William Byrd. William is an established car writer type dude with bylines on Right Foot Down and Oversteer by Autotrader -KK]

Many of you in the Hooniverse community are wondering why you should give a crap that the Ford Mustang GT is offered with an automatic transmission? Others are wondering who the hell I am. Both fair questions to be sure.  

The latter is fairly inconsequential, just know that some years ago I convinced a bunch of foolish automakers to send me new vehicles to drive for a week. They drive them to my house with a full tank of gas, and after a week, take them away and leave a different one. I’m not sure if that makes me any more credible to talk about why you should care about this 10-speed automatic-equipped Mustang than the next guy, but I’m going to give it a shot.

Bias up front

So I’ll put this out there right away, I love Mustangs. I’ve owned half a dozen over the period of a couple of decades, and all of them were fantastic cars in different ways. I like to think that my journalistic training, such that it is, has built in a protection against automatically saying that things are good or bad without giving them a chance. For example, I’ve driven Camaros and said nice things, so that should basically prove that I can overcome bias. 

I have actually never driven a recent Mustang GT with an automatic transmission until now. I wasn’t even positive what spec GT I was getting until I saw it rumbling down the road. Actually I heard it first, more on that later. Once it came into view, majestically cresting the neighbors Prius, the “Twister Orange” paint (a $495 option) delivered a pretty great first impression. My second impression was that it had the wrong transmission, equipped with Ford’s 10-Speed SelectShift® Automatic Transmission (another $1,595). So while I love Mustangs, I generally dislike automatics. As one should.

So there were multiple biases, but they were both good and bad. The week I spent in the Mustang took me to some cool places, including one pretty special location, at a special time. So let’s get started. 

Looks damn good

Automatic or not, it’s hard to argue that this is a really good looking car. Unless you are a die-hard Dodge or Chevy guy. In a sea of grey and black, my week with the Mustang was one of overt extraverted’ness. It’s impossible not to notice this car. It looks like a school bus, at least in paint color. Side note for the parents, our Recaro child seat will fit relatively well, it just reduces the already limited rear seat headroom. So hopefully your kid is short.

The Performance Package ($3,995) helps the aesthetics as well, adding exterior features like 19-inch x 9-inch front and 19-inch x 9.5-inch rear black aluminum wheels plus a slick looking spoiler. The orange and black scheme may be reminiscent of the Great Pumpkin, but I dig it. 

No Longer Crappy on the Inside

If you haven’t driven the latest generation S-550 Mustang, you’re missing out on one of the best tricks Ford has conjured up – the Mustang has a pretty nice interior now. And I say that as a former owner of third, fourth, and fifth generation Mustangs. I made regular excuses for why the plastic surrounding the door pull in my 2003 GT didn’t quite snap into place. My buddy said “I don’t think it’s supposed to be like that” as he accidentally pulled it further out. It never quite snapped back in after that, thanks jerk. 

But even for a $50,000+ car, it still has a pretty nice interior. There a few little touchpoints that I wasn’t a fan of. For example, the plastic used for the paddle shifters feel a little cheap; and for a performance car at this price point, I want something that at least feels like imitation metal. The other materials on the interior are pretty solid. 

They did a great job with the various interfaces though. I like how there are small details on the screens; the paddle shifters pop out to greet you when you crack off a shift in real life. For some time now, Ford has done a great job emulating Nissan with all of the “track apps” and settings, and it’s continued to improve. You definitely feel like you can customize your Mustang experience. 

Unfortunately, like just about every other recent experience I’ve had with Apple CarPlay, as soon as I plug it in my iPhone it basically says “Oh, I assume you’d like to listen to music on your phone, off we go!”. When no, I was just trying to get Waze to show up on the screen while listening to the radio. I grew tired of having to turn Sirius/XM back on and re-tune into the station I was listening to. It’s a multi-step process that you can only accomplish via the steering wheel controls. 

The seats are fantastic, a nice mix of comfort and stability through the turns. The last Ford that I owned personally, a Focus ST, had the fantastic Recaro seats. This was a slightly cushier version of those trimmed in a nice multi-adjustable leather. Overall I had few complaints about the interior. My 12 year old daughter, eternally stuck sitting in the back while her 6-foot tall brother sits up front, wasn’t as amorous about the Mustang’s small back seat. Still, she liked it a lot better than the sea of crossovers that show up at our house.

That Exhaust Though

Every Mustang I have ever bought, I bought for the overall driving experience, the sights and sounds, not because of some namby pamby interior decision. If you want a fancy interior, buy one of those dang German cars! Just kidding, so what’s it like to drive?  

It’s mostly like driving a GT with the manual, but with a bit less control over what gear you are in. I’ll pause for the “thanks Captain Obvious” reaction. The more you drive it, the easier it is to adapt to, but there were definitely times where the transmission was hunting for a single gear like a parent who lost their toddler in a ballpit. There are ten gears available, so a few times I waited in annoyance while it sorted things out. 

The shifts are a little jerky in Sport+ mode, which is probably the mode I spent the most time in. I’m not sure if that was intentionally done by the Ford engineers, many performance cars that I’ve driven tend to have a harder, more abrupt, shift depending on the mode you’re in. The very first time I was driving the car spiritedly in full automatic mode, I hit the brakes to round a hard right turn and it rifled off three quick downshifts like a damn race car. Cool. Generally in Sport+ the Mustang drives like I do, which is to say a little bit like an asshole. 

Around town, downshifts can seem like random decisions by the computer when in stop-and-go traffic. It was definitely enough to make a BMW 335i owner get on the throttle a little bit because he thought I was revving at him. Doesn’t take much, you can pick your own stereotypical “easily provoked” owner out there to place in this scenario. 

Ford’s “Active Valve Performance Exhaust” is pretty magical though, it’s a $895 option and is worth it all day long. I’ve paid that much, or more, for a custom exhaust on a previous generation Mustang that didn’t sound any better. It also has the trick “quiet start” mode where you can set the car to start with less bravado during certain times of the day. I know my neighbor has a pretty young kid, so without that feature there would have been a few 7am starts where I might have felt slightly guilty for rattling his windows. Or not, who knows. 

At full chat, the upgraded exhaust in Sport+ mode sounds like a symphony of death metal bands going for some sort of death metal world record. I’m not sure which record, but it has to do with being loud and brash. I’m sure I annoyed people over the course of my week with the Mustang, especially in tunnels, or basically anywhere that I could get sound to reverberate. 

The Mustang has also long since shook the reputation that it can’t handle curvy roads or racetracks. This test car came with the $1,695 MagneRide® Damping System, which is the first time I’ve experienced it on a new Mustang. It delivers a confident experience while driving fast through twisty roads, I always had it in the back of my mind that the 460 horsepower and 420 lb.-ft. of tire-squealing torque might decide to overrule the suspension and make us face the other direction if I put my foot in it too much. I’d love to try this on a track, maybe next time.

Oh and the Brembo’s stop quite well. As Brembo’s do.  

A Great Visit

LIke most journalist-types, I usually try to find a good location to take photos and experience the car. Since it was painted the color of an emergency vehicle, I was lucky enough to make a stop at the National Fire Academy in Emmitsburg, Maryland.  

It happened around the anniversary of September 11th, which is always a somber day, particularly in the D.C. area. Of the 2,977 victims killed in the September 11 attacks, 412 were emergency workers which included 343 firefighters. Quite a few more have died since then from health issues from the working conditions in the aftermath of the attack.  

I’m not going to try and trade on that awful event for clicks or likes, but I enjoyed the visit and appreciate the opportunity. Here are a few pics.

Finale

I was tempted to call this “Driving a Mustang with an automatic, embracing the heresy” but that seemed a little dramatic. Instead, I had to wonder how many enthusiasts wouldn’t give this car a second look on a dealership lot. The notion that muscle cars have to be manual has been somewhat debunked already, with the competition down the road from Chevy and Dodge both coming to market with automatic transmissions even in their highest spec cars. Plus you have cars like the Nissan GT-R and numerous supercars who only come equipped with an automatic, so it’s not really as much of a big deal as I originally surmised. 

And at my advanced age of 40’ish, there were times that I relished in putting it in “drive” and just relaxing in D.C. traffic. It all came at a price though, an as-tested MSRP of $51,325. That’s not cheap, but it’s the better part of $20,000 less than a BMW M4’s starting price. Would I buy it with the automatic? Well, no. I’d put that extra $1,595 towards the Performance Package – Level 2!

[Disclaimer: Ford lend us the vehicle for the purpose of this review. Images, unless noted, copyright 2019 Hooniverse/William Byrd]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 64 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop files here

38 responses to “2019 Mustang GT 10-Speed Automatic: An Automatic No?”

  1. Mister Sterling Avatar

    The 2019 GT automatic is the only Mustang I’ve ever driven, and it was fantastic. Life changing, even. It helped that I played with it between Santa Cruz and Big Sur. I don’t judge drivers by their ability to shift a manual. Manuals are going away. The Mustang GT, for me, is both a cruiser and a pony car. Not a track car, no ( that’s the GT 350 and GT 500, both with manuals). But what a value for that power and sound. I love the Jaguar F-Type, but there’s no denying that if I had space in my garage for one performance car, it would have to be the more practical, less expensive and roomier Mustang.

  2. Mister Sterling Avatar

    The 2019 GT automatic is the only Mustang I’ve ever driven, and it was fantastic. Life changing, even. It helped that I played with it between Santa Cruz and Big Sur. I don’t judge drivers by their ability to shift a manual. Manuals are going away. The Mustang GT, for me, is both a cruiser and a pony car. Not a track car, no ( that’s the GT 350 and GT 500, both with manuals). But what a value for that power and sound. I love the Jaguar F-Type, but there’s no denying that if I had space in my garage for one performance car, it would have to be the more practical, less expensive and roomier Mustang.

    1. William Byrd Avatar
      William Byrd

      My first comment on Hooniverse! Thanks, well written and well thought out. I’ve been debating Mustang vs. (fill in the blank more luxury’ish sporty car) and it’s hard to not come back to the Mustang.

    2. Zentropy Avatar
      Zentropy

      I don’t judge anyone based on ability to shift a manual, either, but their preference tells me a lot about them as a driver. The GT is exactly what it advertises– a Grand Tourer. An automatic is completely appropriate in this car– for people who like them.

      When the author mentioned the car’s sound, my thoughts likewise went immediately to the Jag F-Type. It sounds great with the V8, but perhaps more significant is the sound of the V6. Most V6s sound terrible to me, which makes the Jag’s six that much more impressive.

      I’m personally not a huge fan of the Coyote exhaust sound. It’s not bad by any means, and it sounds better as the revs get higher, but at idle and cruising speeds it doesn’t impress. Despite their lesser performance, for pure sound I still prefer the pushrod 289s/302s and 2V 4.6s.

      1. William Byrd Avatar
        William Byrd

        Agree to disagree on it being just a Grand Tourer. I won Street Touring X in a very lightly modified 2003 GT autocross car, so even back then it was pretty solid from a handling standpoint, it just needed some tweaks. Now I’d say that a stock PP2 GT would run circles around most cars on a track.

        1. Zentropy Avatar
          Zentropy

          Oh, it has huge potential, for sure, and when you start adding performance packages, it gets considerably more sporty. The GT350 is a sports car, in my book. But with the introduction of the S550, the Mustang stepped into the Grand Tourer category, IMO, in which an automatic is not out of the question at all. Whereas I used to consider the Mustang a “pony car” or “muscle car” depending on the year model, it’s become too refined for those descriptions. I wouldn’t, however, call the Camaro or Challenger a “GT”.

          1. William Byrd Avatar
            William Byrd

            I was with you until you said that the boat-of-a-car Challenger isn’t a GT! haha It’s the biggest and heaviest and really still rides on that old Daimler-Chrysler adapted E-Class platform doesn’t it? Quick curb weight comparison (which isn’t everything, but it’s a lot)

            Challenger – 3,894 to 4,448 lbs
            Mustang – 3,532 to 3,825 lbs
            Camaro – 3,351 to 4,120 lbs

            I would note that, just because the GT350 exists, it doesn’t mean the GT isn’t track-worthy with the right options. Don’t think this orange car I just tested is fully track ready, but with the magnetic suspension and brembo’s, it’s not that far off. Impressive IMO that it might be GT and track car!

            Sorry, that bias is coming out a little bit! lol Candidly my next car could just as easily be a Challenger as it could a Mustang. I love the larger size and better ride. Plus, Hellcat!

          2. Maymar Avatar
            Maymar

            Apologies because it’s one of my pedant triggers, but the Chrysler LX/LC platforms aren’t an old adapted E-class platform. It’s a Chrysler platform that borrows a couple pieces from Daimler-Benz (firewall and some suspension, but from both W211 E-class and W221 S-Class, I believe).

          3. William Byrd Avatar
            William Byrd

            No worries there, appreciate the clarification!

          4. Zentropy Avatar
            Zentropy

            The arguments about “what is a sports car” and “what is a grand tourer” have been going on for decades. I follow the classic definition of a grand tourer, which requires a better interior than the Challenger provides. To me, a GT isn’t an overweight sports car– it’s a blend of high-speed performance and long-distance comfort. I think of the Dodge as a muscle car: a basic, non-sports-car that gets its performance from a big, torquey engine. The Challenger is no penalty box, but it’s fairly low-rent inside. The Mustang’s interior feels more upscale than either the Challenger or the Camaro.
            These days, there’s no reason a GT can’t also be a good track car, but that doesn’t mean any good track car (or muscle car) is a grand tourer. I don’t race my cars, so I like the Challenger, and feel the manual 392 Scat Pack is the sweet spot of the lineup. If Dodge offered a manual in the Charger, though, I’d choose the four-door instead. I have no use for the Hellcat.

          5. William Byrd Avatar
            William Byrd

            Ok I aligned to just about everything you just said there, especially about the manual in the Charger. I have 3 kids and the Challenger actually has a pretty big back seat, I’d just get tired of having them climb in and out of the front. A manual Charger 392 would be a done deal. I like the Hellcat for the lunacy and because it’s the top of the food chain.

          6. crank_case Avatar
            crank_case

            Or to convert from silly imperial terms to more useful units

            Challenger – 2.4 to 2.7 Suzuki Cappuccinos
            Mustang – 2.2 to 2.3 Suzuki Cappuccinos
            Camaro – 2.1 to 2.5 Suzuki Cappuccinos

            I mean any car can be used on track if you’re determined enough, I’ve seen someone take a Range Rover on track (like an overweight bulldog trying to run on a polished floor, but y’know, no-one died), or a Holden Ute (surprisingly quick, but very sideways), or by total contrast a stripped out Fiat Cinquecento (as in the boxy 90s one, not the “500”) provideded decent pace and fun for very little money. To differentiate challenger/mustang/camaro as “track car” or “GT” is making unneccesary slight distinctions because it’s slightly less of a lardbucket than the another thing.

            It’s a GT-ish thing and that’s ok, so is a 370Z or a modern 911 in my book, you can also take those on a track just fine.

            The only things I’d describe specifically as “track cars” would be race car refugees like Radicals/Atoms/extreme variants of Caterham, etc. even most Lotusesezes (Loti?) are primarily road cars.

          7. William Byrd Avatar
            William Byrd

            That’s a fantastic reply and I shall move to the Cappuccino scale for weights and measures now! hahahaha

      2. crank_case Avatar
        crank_case

        The Mustang is pretty much an American Audi A5 rival these days. An auto makes sense. You can cal it a “sports car”, but It’s not exactly a Miata/GT86/Lotus/Alpine is it? It’s a pretty hefty car and a decent place to spend covering distance, so depending on what you want from it, why not? .especially if it’s a good auto.

        1. William Byrd Avatar
          William Byrd

          The S5 is actually on my list for my next car along with the Mustang, so that’s not too far off.

  3. Greg Kachadurian Avatar
    Greg Kachadurian

    “Would I buy it with the automatic? Well, no. I’d put that extra $1,595 towards the Performance Package – Level 2!” https://media3.giphy.com/media/WSvYuKhLwaxuE/giphy.gif

    1. William Byrd Avatar
      William Byrd

      haha that’s great. I wish that $1,595 covered more of the PP2 price tag, but it’s worth it.

  4. neight428 Avatar
    neight428

    I personally can’t seem to shake the urge to quickly check 1/4 mile times. The A10 GT’s are seeing 11’s full weight, bone stock. Connectedness to the machine and control is nice and all, but have you ever tried hauling absolute ass?

    1. Zentropy Avatar
      Zentropy

      Automatics are significantly faster for casual drag racing. Unless you can bang away on a clutchless manual built for dragging, the time taken to depress/shift/release in a conventional manual means time that you’re not accelerating.
      I recall guys in high school snapping up (otherwise useless) Powerglide transmissions at the salvage yard for their dragstrip project cars. I never quite understood the point of going fast in a straight line, though. I mean, you can do that by falling off a cliff. Give me gears and curves, any day.

      1. neight428 Avatar
        neight428

        Don’t necessarily disagree, but the gap has closed significantly since the days of powerglides.

        The power loss through the fluid coupling and extra weight used to mean that in stock form, the manual versions were nearly always quicker until the 6-10 speed computer controlled autos started making the rounds in the last decade. Wide gear spreads and tight converters in stock form didn’t help either. A high stall Powerglide or TH350/400 took care of all of that problem for a drag race, but made the cars pretty ridiculous to live with on a daily basis. Now, the computer sees what you’re about and uses all the ratios at its disposal to keep you in the meat of the powerband the whole way, I think that’s amazing work.

        I see drag racing as more accessible in that one can experiment and an average joe is more likely to be able to get the most out of what he has paid for, whereas road course performance driving requires much more skill, time and the track days seem to be harder to get to and more expensive besides, but is probably more enjoyable in the moment, I haven’t had the opportunity. As for enjoying in the curves, no question that rowing your own is more rewarding.

        1. outback_ute Avatar
          outback_ute

          Autos have been a lot better since they spend 99% of the time with the torque converter locked up which benefits performance, economy and ‘feel’.

          With 10 speeds you’d need the paddles to change 2 gears at a time to make it worthwhile surely.

  5. Zentropy Avatar
    Zentropy

    Three points:
    1) What a great friggin’ gig… like a beer-of-the-week club, but with cars. I completely missed my ideal career with the whole science degree thing.
    2) $50k for a Mustang GT still makes me flinch, no matter how often I hear it. What the hell has happened to car prices?
    3) I don’t care where this Byrd guy came from– I like his writing style, even if he does say nice things about automatics. (Fun read, dude. Keep up the contributions!)

    1. William Byrd Avatar
      William Byrd

      haha thanks I like this place so far.

    2. Maymar Avatar
      Maymar

      At least a base GT is “only” $37k. Also, if you’re willing to go to the effort of importation, a Canadian market model is just 35,000 loonies with current incentives (about $26,500 USD).

      1. Zentropy Avatar
        Zentropy

        Wow… that’s pretty cheap in Canada! I don’t know how much of a hassle it is to import, but you’d think it’d be worth a ten-grand savings.

        1. William Byrd Avatar
          William Byrd

          My thought on price – it’s 1 part inflation and 1 part worth. The better part of a decade ago, the Mustang became nearly as fast as an M3. I owned one and always loved this article:

          https://www.motortrend.com/cars/bmw/m3/2011/2011-2011-ford-mustang-gt-vs-2011-bmw-m3-comparison/

          Back in 2011 it cost $40,000 and the M3 was north of $60,000. Fast forward eight or nine years and the M3 (well m4) starts at almost $70,000. So a $50,000 Mustang makes sense from that standpoint, stuff costs more a decade later and people are willing to pay for something like a Mustang that’s legitimately quick and has had some nice redesigns since 2011.

          1. Zentropy Avatar
            Zentropy

            I remember that article well, and recall quoting from it in support of the Mustang’s brilliance. In fact, if I were in a position to buy a Mustang right now, I would buy a used S197 before I would even consider a new one.

            I agree that $50k for a Mustang that competes with an M4 that’s 40% more expensive is a relative bargain. But then, $27k for a Toyota 86 makes even more sense to me. No, it’s not nearly as fast, but arguably more fun on normal roads.

            The “worth” part of your equation is the wild variable. Some people might think $20k more for that BMW is money well spent if they don’t have to drive a Ford. Some obviously feel that $365k for a Ferrari 812 Superfast is “worth it” for such an elite vehicle. The price tag isn’t determined by the materials, the development, or the labor, but by how much people want something. It’s not rational. Me, I don’t have $50,000 worth of “want” for a new Mustang, even slathered in beautiful orange paint. I may, however, have $15,000 worth of “want” for a used S197!

          2. William Byrd Avatar
            William Byrd

            Oh definitely. I think worth in this instance is more of a “what someone will pay for it” since as you noted, people will pay more for a Ferrari than a lot of people pay for a house! I think my summary is that I don’t blame Ford for charging $50,000 for a Mustang since people will pay that, and objectively measured against a $70,000 car it’s close to as good (my assessment, many BMW fans will disagree). I personally think it’s worth it and would pay that much for it. Well, not this one, one with a manual. haha

            Agree to disagree again on the ’86. haha Fun on back roads, yeah mostly, maybe really curvy ones (sort of like a Miata) but every time I’m coming out of a tight turn in 2nd I’m wishing there was more oomph waiting for me.

          3. Zentropy Avatar
            Zentropy

            Had I never experienced the E30, I might agree with you on the Mustang vs 86 debate, but BMW’s 80s compact made me into a “slow car, fast” kind of enthusiast. I still find power in a car impressive, but not as intoxicating as it once was. I appreciate the accessibility of more modest cars, ones that can be enjoyed every day on regular roads without risking a ticket or injury. Give me 5 or 6 manual gears, rear-wheel drive, communicative steering, and a responsive chassis, and I’m generally a happy driver regardless of the horsepower.

          4. William Byrd Avatar
            William Byrd

            Maybe I’m being nostalgic, but the ’86 is no E30 (assuming you mean the M3, if not, disregard). Similar power but the M3 was lighter.

            My issue, likely, is that I’ve owned a handful of 400+ horsepower cars and now other cars feel slow. The ’86 in particular.

          5. Zentropy Avatar
            Zentropy

            Haha, no, not the E30 M3. Not even the 325i. I learned to momentum-drive on a 325e— as in, the low-revving, 121-hp 2.7 “eta” engine. I’m sure rose-colored glasses play a part (I dated my wife in it), but I absolutely loved that car. It had the best chassis and steering combination of any vehicle I’d ever owned. I had a looooong mountain-highway work commute at the time (as in 1400-miles/week), so I became very familiar with the car’s abilities and limitations. It was almost a mechanical extension of my own senses, fulfilling Mazda’s “Jinba Ittai” design philosophy years before the Japanese company embraced the concept.
            The power/weight ratio on my E30 sedan was a mere 0.45 hp/10 lb and my best 0-60 was a shade over 9.5 seconds. That makes the Toyota 86 a relative rocket at 0.74 and 6.2. The oft-vaunted E30 M3 slightly trails the 86 at 0.73 and 6.4 seconds. I think I would find the Toyota pretty satisfying, if only it were a sedan.

  6. outback_ute Avatar
    outback_ute

    Nice review. With so many gears to chose from you think they’d make it hard for the trans to be indecisive; even if it picks a gear either side of the optimum gear in any situation it’s not going to make that much difference compared to a 6-speed auto.

  7. outback_ute Avatar
    outback_ute

    Nice review. With so many gears to chose from you think they’d make it hard for the trans to be indecisive; even if it picks a gear either side of the optimum gear in any situation it’s not going to make that much difference compared to a 6-speed auto.

    1. Troggy Avatar
      Troggy

      I feel much the same way – a gear either way shouldn’t really hurt as the ratios are so close. My 8 speed Touareg has a similar issue if you catch it by surprise by suddenly flooring it. It’s comfortable doing 60 in anywhere from 3rd to 7th gear, so it can do a lot of swapping sometimes if it’s not sure of exactly how much power you were asking for.
      I sort-of understand it with a turbo diesel with a narrow-ish power band, but you’d think that a V8 wouldn’t be too bothered by a picking a gear either side of optimum.

    2. William Byrd Avatar
      William Byrd

      I barely used 7+ except when it was in full-auto on the highway.

  8. Troggy Avatar
    Troggy

    Do you find that paddle shifter to be of much use at all with so many gears, and computers being better able to know when to change?
    I have an 8 speed Touareg. I experimented with ‘manual mode’ a few times, including on a racetrack (I use it as a course car, not ‘tracking’ as such) and I now only use ‘manual mode’ to keep it from cogging between gears when towing something heavy up steep hills. I’d imagine that towing (or steep hills!) wouldn’t be an issue for a Mustang.

    1. William Byrd Avatar
      William Byrd

      Sort of. Honestly it’s more that I like to hear the engine and the active exhaust, so I was downshifting at times where the computer wouldn’t (parking garages in particular). it’s definitely engineered for high revs, it will hold a gear way longer than must slushboxes I’ve driven. Would be fun to try it on a track in full auto mode. Seems to be what it’s tuned for.

  9. Angela Seed Avatar
    Angela Seed

    I have a 2019 with the 10-speed automatic transmission and have already had problems with it. It was jerking – actually jumped – when I put it in reverse and drive. It also jerked a little when gearing down pulling up to a traffic light. Ford said it was the computer (luckily it is under warranty still) and they reset it. Is this something you have heard about? I know there is a law suit agains Ford for the 10-speed manual and the F-150 10-speed automatics, but I haven’t really heard anything about the Mustangs that are 4-cylinder. I have not had this car a year yet, and I would like to keep it a long time. But, I don’t want to have transmission problems all the time!!! I love my Mustang!! I really don’t want to get rid of it if I don’t have to. Thanks so much!! Angela